[lugsoul]

No, he didn't. He issued an injunction granting the relief requested by the Plaintiffs, which was the removal of the monument on the grounds that its placement - along with Moore's stated intent behind the placement - violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment incorporated against the states by the 14th Amendment - according to binding SCOTUS precedent - as determined by application of the Lemon Test as required by binding SCOTUS precedent.

Now, let's see if you can articulate an argument that any part of that is incorrect.

[EternalVigilance]

Now, let's see if you can articulate an argument that any part of that is incorrect.

It is a pretty little edifice built on nothing.

Their reading of the First Amendment is ridiculous. The emporer has no clothes. Surprised you haven't noticed, 'cause he looks silly.

[EternalVigilance]

BTW, one of the reasons he looks silly, other than that he is naked, is that he isn't really the emporer, either. He just thinks he is.