No act of Congress was involved here, so your point is pointless.
Read the First Amendment with your mind unclouded by modern liberal revisionist thinking.
Now, apply the 14th and the question is, has an omnicient judiciary been created? That is a far more profound question than anything contained in the personal attacks you level at me.
For a federal judge to dictate in such a way based on nonexistent law which in fact cannot exist is tyrannical and 'lawless'.
Once again, I see nothing in the First which applies here. This is a state with a religious monument in its courthouse, which is a 10th Amendment issue, not a 1st.
Obviously, the fact that the courts cannot just make up laws from whole cloth goes over your head.
Perhaps you mean omnipotent; and yes, they now think they are omnipotent. Patriots who believe in limited government will fight to show them their error.
My personal attack on your desire to put off the fight until conditions are more suitable in your opinion was mild. I must have hit a sore spot though.