Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Catspaw
No, it's about two mortals, Roy Moore and William Pryor

and they are disagreeing about what precisely? The public display of The Ten Commandments.
223 posted on 11/11/2003 3:00:59 PM PST by farmer18th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]


To: farmer18th
"and they are disagreeing about what precisely?"

The obligations of a sitting judge to comply with the Canons of Judicial Ethics.

237 posted on 11/11/2003 3:08:53 PM PST by lugsoul (And I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

To: farmer18th
and they are disagreeing about what precisely? The public display of The Ten Commandments.

No. Had you been paying attention, that matter was resolved by the federal courts and, after Moore's suspension, the acting chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court and the seven remaining justices ordered Roy's Rock removed.

Tomorrow's hearing before the Judicial Review Board is whether Moore is removed from office, suspended or restored to office. It is based, in part, on whether Moore complied with the court order and if he's restored to office, whether he would continue to comply with the court order.

The dispute about the monument is resolved. The final blow was the US Supreme Court refusing to take the case.

241 posted on 11/11/2003 3:10:03 PM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson