Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Federalist
Get a grip on your lack of context. If you know anything about this case, you know that Moore openly took the position that the court COULD NOT ENFORCE any order it issed and that he had no intention of complying. That is a bit different than claiming lack of jurisdiction - but, of course, you probably have the sense to realize that this was straight up federal question jurisdiction.
166 posted on 11/11/2003 2:05:24 PM PST by lugsoul (And I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul
I'm not saying that this case was a case where jurisdiction was implicated, but your statement that I critcized was much more universal.

Besides, the Court could not enforce the order without the help of the legislative and executive branches. Congress voted to withhold funding for any enforcement of the order and there is no indication that Bush had any intention of calling out the U.S. Marshals. Therefore, the Court COULD NOT ENFORCE (I like to use capital letters too) the order.
174 posted on 11/11/2003 2:12:40 PM PST by Texas Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson