Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
And, in this case, Pryor was following the law as dictated by federal court. I personally disagreed with the ruling, but it's ludicrous to get after Pryor for not following the law.

I'm glad that the federal court didn't order Pryor to take off his clothes and quack like a duck, because I guess we're all required to obey a federal court ruling no matter how ridiculous or how legally unfounded that ruling may be.

149 posted on 11/11/2003 1:56:50 PM PST by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: usadave
I'm glad that the federal court didn't order Pryor to take off his clothes and quack like a duck, because I guess we're all required to obey a federal court ruling no matter how ridiculous or how legally unfounded that ruling may be.

That's not what I'm arguing. The poster of this thread claimed that Pryor was not following the law, and I am demostrating that he is, in fact, following the law as it stands in this day and age. The real gripe against Pryor is that he is, in fact, following the law as laid down by a federal judge, when his opponents wish he tell the feds to stuff it.

359 posted on 11/12/2003 7:11:08 AM PST by dirtboy (New Ben and Jerry's flavor - Howard Dean Swirl - no ice cream, just fruit at bottom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson