Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Condon wins Senate race poll, but Beasley's name bandied about [SC]
The Post and Courier (Charleston.net) ^ | 11/11/2003 | Schuyler Kropf

Posted on 11/11/2003 7:27:57 AM PST by JohnnyZ

Former Attorney General Charlie Condon won Monday's Charles-ton County Republican Party straw poll of candidates in next year's U.S. Senate race, but the name of potential candidate David Beasley kept cropping up. Many party members said Beas-ley should get in the race, despite the baggage of losing the governor's office in 1998 after one term.

"I would think he'd be the real front-runner," Republican Vickie McCoy said at Monday's county convention, where long-time GOP activist Cyndi Mosteller was elected party chairwoman, defeating Charles Steinert.

Condon, of Sullivan's Island, collected 152 votes in the straw poll of the four Republicans running to succeed retiring Democrat Fritz Hollings. Condon was followed by local developer Thomas Ravenel with 119 votes; U.S. Rep. Jim DeMint of Greenville, 61 votes; and Myrtle Beach Mayor Mark McBride, 44 votes. Beasley, who hasn't decided whether to run, collected two votes.

(Excerpt) Read more at charleston.net ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: beasley; condon; demint; ravenel
Registration required.

Beasley was defeated by Jim Hodges in a shocker over the Confederate flag (he endorsed its removal from the Statehouse dome) and the lottery (he opposed it).

What do SC Freepers think about Beasley's enduring popularity or lack thereof?

DeMint seems to be having a lot of trouble as a free trader. Condon's support seems pretty strong, and Revenel's surprisingly so.

1 posted on 11/11/2003 7:27:57 AM PST by JohnnyZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
I thought Jim DeMint was the Anointed One from the WH. What's goin' on there?
2 posted on 11/11/2003 7:32:15 AM PST by TheBigB (We are a NEWSPAPER! We are supposed to print THE NEWS! -- Carl Kolchak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
I'm going to have real trouble voting for David Weaseley after the flag stunt. To me, it's not so much about the flag (I actually like the compromise they came up with about putting it at the Confederate Soldiers' Monument) but the fact that it shows Weaseley will backstab his base at the drop of a hat. You can't trust what he says. And he hasn't learned from getting pimpslapped by Uncle Jim Hodges.

}:-)4
3 posted on 11/11/2003 7:36:45 AM PST by Moose4 ("Germans?" "Forget it, he's rolling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Beasley is still only 46, and ironically beat ARTHUR Ravenel in the Republican primary for governor back in 94. Thomas Ravenel, 41, is the guy being interrogated by the cops (okay, it's a photo op). DeMint, 52ish, is the 4th district congressman. Condon, 50, was SC's first Republican AG since Reconstruction.


4 posted on 11/11/2003 7:43:38 AM PST by JohnnyZ (Red Sox in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
As I understand, Lowcountry folk will not vote for Pee Dees or Upstaters. There is already one Upstater in the Senate, so the Lowcountry is going to vote their own, not DeMint or Beasley. Take the poll in the Upstate, and DeMint wins. Just as long as it's a Republican, it don't matter. We add a seat and Fog Horn Leg Horn is history!
5 posted on 11/11/2003 7:43:45 AM PST by samanella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
I thought Jim DeMint was the Anointed One from the WH.

Although DeMint has stressed his close ties to the White House, they have consistently denied taking sides in the primary.

6 posted on 11/11/2003 7:45:12 AM PST by JohnnyZ (Red Sox in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
***Charlie Condon won Monday's Charles-ton County Republican Party straw poll***

No surprise here. Condon is from Charleston.

I don't think Beasley accepting the Kennedy Profile in Courage award last year for opposing the Confederate flag will endure himself to South Carolina conservatives.
7 posted on 11/11/2003 9:45:34 AM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
It seems to me that the GOP is favored to win SC, though the Dems keep claiming that Tennenbaum (spelling) is the candidate to be defeated. Personally, I think that's nonsense. Any idea how the GOP is standing against her these days, or is it too soon to tell?
8 posted on 11/11/2003 10:04:46 AM PST by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Dems 2004
It seems to me that the GOP is favored to win SC, though the Dems keep claiming that Tennenbaum (spelling) is the candidate to be defeated.

Yes and Yes. The GOP is favored, but Tenenbaum is leading in the polls. CW is that her support is soft, generated by an uncontroversial tenure as Super Ed, and that she'll be cut down to size when she has to talk about federal issues. But I'm still worried about our nominees, as DeMint (trade) and Condon (style) have vulnerabilities.

9 posted on 11/11/2003 11:37:49 AM PST by JohnnyZ (Red Sox in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
***Tenenbaum is leading in the polls.***

The lead is probably soley due to name ID. Still, DeMint and Condon had better get out and meet the voters.
10 posted on 11/11/2003 4:43:59 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
As a Tarheel, how bad is the local backlash against President Bush in regards to job lossses in the textile industry?
11 posted on 11/11/2003 7:43:58 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
It's hard to say. It's pretty bad in some places, I guess. Charlotte isn't a manufacting/textile center, so we've been spared for the most part. It hasn't helped that folks like Rep. Sue Myrick (R) have been running around saying "President Bush doesn't care about people like you", and "he just doesn't understand" to laid off textile workers. Thanks a lot, Sue. In response to my complaint, she said she hadn't intented her remarks to be published by the media, she was just speaking from the heart.

Folks blame trade 'cause it's an easy bogeyman, but for the most part they're right: if China and Vietnam didn't cheat on the free trade pacts we've made with them, textiles would be fine.

If trade were the only issue, they wouldn't vote Bush. Thankfully it's not. The Democrats are salivating at the chance of using it against Richard Burr, but of course Erskine is on record pimping Bill Clinton's trade deals while Burr voted against PNTR for China and all that.

12 posted on 11/11/2003 8:39:14 PM PST by JohnnyZ (Red Sox in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Last year, Bowles ran on a platform of high tariffs and economic protectionism. As a result, Bowles carried the "Old South" areas. Whereas, Liddy Dole heavily carried the "New South" suburbs. I think the Burr vs Bowles race could have a similar result.
13 posted on 11/11/2003 8:50:11 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
The key to victory for Richard Burr would be to carry Mecklenburg, Johnston, and Wake counties. If Burr can win those counties, then I don't see how Bowles could win.
14 posted on 11/11/2003 8:54:59 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson