[NYCVirago]

Wonder if UCMJ covers the sellers of these photos still. They could be considered obscene... They could be considered profiteering from a soldier or veterans duress.. Something?

Why? She posed for them!

Sorry, I have absolutely no sympathy for Jessica Lynch on this. She posed for topless photos with not one but two guys while she was in the military. That was unfathomably stupid.

[milemark]

Flynt has backed down, probably in the face of a multi-million dollar lawsuit.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102736,00.html

[bullseye1911]

Sorry, I have absolutely no sympathy for Jessica Lynch on this. She posed for topless photos with not one but two guys while she was in the military. That was unfathomably stupid.

I must agree with you there. I was raised with (and passed on to my kids) this admonition: Don't lie, Don't steal, Don't let people take nekkid pictures of you!!!Regards.

[muawiyah]

First off, this guy has claimed to have photos many times when he had nothing. (Thinking of a Presidential candidate dancing nude on top of a bar in a nightclub?)

Second, the descriptions he gives suggest these were not "posed" shots.

Third, if true, they belong to the US Army until they are properly released ~ because, according to the story, they were taken inside a military reservation. Rumsfeld himself would have to have handed them over.

Somebody better hope this is just another Larry Flynt BS job.

[ought-six]

I have to agree with you. She willingly posed for these photos. It's not like she was filmed in the shower by a hidden camera. She made the decision to have herself photographed in an undressed state, and she has to live with it.

[robertpaulsen]

"She posed for them!"

She did? She posed? Where did you read that?

The way I read it, there were two pictures taken of her "frolicking" and "cavorting" -- sounds to me as though the pictures were taken surreptitiously or, at worst, spontaneously and casually.