Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
She did? She posed? Where did you read that? The way I read it, there were two pictures taken of her "frolicking" and "cavorting" -- sounds to me as though the pictures were taken surreptitiously or, at worst, spontaneously and casually.

Let me put it this way. She ran around topless with not one but two guys. A third person was able to take pix. Call me a prude, but she shouldn't have been flashing her boobs to at least two of her fellow soldiers. What, was she auditioning for "Military Girls Gone Wild"?

59 posted on 11/11/2003 9:35:18 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: NYCVirago
"but she shouldn't have been flashing her boobs to at least two of her fellow soldiers"

I agree.

And I won't call you a prude if you won't call me old-fashioned when I say that the person with the camera never should have taken those pictures. Given that he did take them, he never should have released them, or the negatives, to anyone.

Her not acting like a lady is no excuse for him not acting like a gentleman.

71 posted on 11/11/2003 11:32:11 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson