Skip to comments.
The Hydrogen Hallucination
Solar Acess ^
| 11/10/03
| Mark Sardella
Posted on 11/10/2003 6:58:27 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Hydrogen works great as a fuel for Nuclear Fusion.
2
posted on
11/10/2003 7:01:26 AM PST
by
sd-joe
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
He's not just saying we can't do it now, but that it can never be done.
Not the visionary I would like to hire for my research lab.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
A simple solution to the transportation problem IMO would be electrolysis. Instead of transporting hydrogen you transport water, then by way of electricity from a nuclear power plant, the water would be broken down--at an electrolysis station either in your garage or at a fueling station--into hydrogen and oxygen. Bam there's your fuel.
Gasoline is upwards of $1.50 per gallon. This way you'd have to pay the nickel or dime for a gallon(s) of water, and I doubt it would cost much more than a dollar for the electricity to free the hydrogen from it.
To: BlueString
"Gasoline is upwards of $1.50 per gallon. This way you'd have to pay the nickel or dime for a gallon(s) of water, and I doubt it would cost much more than a dollar for the electricity to free the hydrogen from it."Non-scientific agreement.
I remember the 7th grade experiment in science class ... didn't take long for the tubes to go two to one.
5
posted on
11/10/2003 7:22:35 AM PST
by
knarf
(A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
To: knarf
I remember that as well. I was always curious, what is produced when hydrogen ignites? Helium?
6
posted on
11/10/2003 7:27:25 AM PST
by
RandallFlagg
("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
To: RushingWater
Not the visionary I would like to hire for my research lab. Reality sucks, doesn't it?
Maybe you should hire a chemist from Greenpeace?
ML/NJ
7
posted on
11/10/2003 7:30:43 AM PST
by
ml/nj
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
There are many vehicles doing just fine right now with hydrogen fuel. A lot of negative emotional nonsense here.
8
posted on
11/10/2003 7:30:57 AM PST
by
tkathy
(The islamofascists and the democrats are trying to destroy this country)
To: RandallFlagg
Water. H combines with O
9
posted on
11/10/2003 7:31:03 AM PST
by
bryanbig
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
To: RandallFlagg
The combustion of hydrogen in oxygen yields water.
Helium can be produced from hydrogen only through the process of fusion.
11
posted on
11/10/2003 7:33:20 AM PST
by
SAJ
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This is a very clear explanation of the difference between an energy source and an energy carrier.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Same point I've made before. You can only get hydrogen fuel through various processes that break water apart. The First Law of Thermodynamics says you can't get more energy out than you put in. The Second Law of Thermodynamics says you can never quite break even. So, as he says, hydrogen will never be an energy SOURCE, only an energy STORE--and probably not the best or safest store at that.
Hydrogen fuel cells could work tomorrow IF we develop another workable energy source, namely nuclear power. That would instantly solve the problem--it's the only feasible source of power that doesn't use fossil fuel for the foreseeable future. But the greens and the politicians will never allow it.
So hydrogen fuel cells are nothing but an expensive political boondoggle, as any decent scientist well understands. But the scientists working in the field also understand that billions of federal dollars are lining up to fall into their pockets. So who can blame them for agreeing to go along with this three-card-monte trick?
13
posted on
11/10/2003 7:35:27 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: tkathy
No ones says that H2 cannot be used to power a vehicle, merely that it is an unbelievably inefficient power source...or, rather, as the author put it very well, energy carrier, not source.
14
posted on
11/10/2003 7:35:46 AM PST
by
SAJ
To: BlueString
and I doubt it would cost much more than a dollar for the electricity to free the hydrogen from it. Do the math. That's quite an assumption you are making there.
Or you could just read the article.
To: BlueString
Well...another way to look at this would be to burn large quantities of low sulfur coal at a central power facility and pipe the energy to where its needed via electric lines.
To: Cicero
Hydrogen fuel cells could work tomorrow IF we develop another workable energy source, namely nuclear power. The best way to accomplish that would be to shoot all the wacko environmentalists into the sun.
To: hopespringseternal
I don't see why since you can do it with a $.55 battery.
But maybe you're right.
To: SAJ
I'll say it again. The most efficient method of storing and transporting hydrogen energy is to chemically bond the hydrogen to carbon atoms, forming ethane, methane, propane, octane. Coal, oil, and gas.
19
posted on
11/10/2003 7:52:12 AM PST
by
Fudd
To: Cicero
You are right. Free Hydrogen in any quantity needs to be stored at high-pressure, in a heavy metal container to hold the pressure.
I'll bet if we had started with a hydrogen economy, everyone would be trying to develop a nice liquid form (like gasoline or diesel) so it could be carried more efficiently and safely.
20
posted on
11/10/2003 7:58:43 AM PST
by
expatpat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson