Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Hydrogen Hallucination
Solar Acess ^ | 11/10/03 | Mark Sardella

Posted on 11/10/2003 6:58:27 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

1 posted on 11/10/2003 6:58:28 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Hydrogen works great as a fuel for Nuclear Fusion.
2 posted on 11/10/2003 7:01:26 AM PST by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
He's not just saying we can't do it now, but that it can never be done.

Not the visionary I would like to hire for my research lab.
3 posted on 11/10/2003 7:14:41 AM PST by RushingWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
A simple solution to the transportation problem IMO would be electrolysis. Instead of transporting hydrogen you transport water, then by way of electricity from a nuclear power plant, the water would be broken down--at an electrolysis station either in your garage or at a fueling station--into hydrogen and oxygen. Bam there's your fuel.

Gasoline is upwards of $1.50 per gallon. This way you'd have to pay the nickel or dime for a gallon(s) of water, and I doubt it would cost much more than a dollar for the electricity to free the hydrogen from it.
4 posted on 11/10/2003 7:15:41 AM PST by BlueString
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueString
"Gasoline is upwards of $1.50 per gallon. This way you'd have to pay the nickel or dime for a gallon(s) of water, and I doubt it would cost much more than a dollar for the electricity to free the hydrogen from it."

Non-scientific agreement.

I remember the 7th grade experiment in science class ... didn't take long for the tubes to go two to one.

5 posted on 11/10/2003 7:22:35 AM PST by knarf (A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knarf
I remember that as well. I was always curious, what is produced when hydrogen ignites? Helium?
6 posted on 11/10/2003 7:27:25 AM PST by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RushingWater
Not the visionary I would like to hire for my research lab.

Reality sucks, doesn't it?

Maybe you should hire a chemist from Greenpeace?

ML/NJ

7 posted on 11/10/2003 7:30:43 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
There are many vehicles doing just fine right now with hydrogen fuel. A lot of negative emotional nonsense here.
8 posted on 11/10/2003 7:30:57 AM PST by tkathy (The islamofascists and the democrats are trying to destroy this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
Water. H combines with O
9 posted on 11/10/2003 7:31:03 AM PST by bryanbig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Check out this hallucination!
10 posted on 11/10/2003 7:31:11 AM PST by RushingWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
The combustion of hydrogen in oxygen yields water.

Helium can be produced from hydrogen only through the process of fusion.

11 posted on 11/10/2003 7:33:20 AM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This is a very clear explanation of the difference between an energy source and an energy carrier.
12 posted on 11/10/2003 7:35:06 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Same point I've made before. You can only get hydrogen fuel through various processes that break water apart. The First Law of Thermodynamics says you can't get more energy out than you put in. The Second Law of Thermodynamics says you can never quite break even. So, as he says, hydrogen will never be an energy SOURCE, only an energy STORE--and probably not the best or safest store at that.

Hydrogen fuel cells could work tomorrow IF we develop another workable energy source, namely nuclear power. That would instantly solve the problem--it's the only feasible source of power that doesn't use fossil fuel for the foreseeable future. But the greens and the politicians will never allow it.

So hydrogen fuel cells are nothing but an expensive political boondoggle, as any decent scientist well understands. But the scientists working in the field also understand that billions of federal dollars are lining up to fall into their pockets. So who can blame them for agreeing to go along with this three-card-monte trick?
13 posted on 11/10/2003 7:35:27 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
No ones says that H2 cannot be used to power a vehicle, merely that it is an unbelievably inefficient power source...or, rather, as the author put it very well, energy carrier, not source.
14 posted on 11/10/2003 7:35:46 AM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BlueString
and I doubt it would cost much more than a dollar for the electricity to free the hydrogen from it.

Do the math. That's quite an assumption you are making there.

Or you could just read the article.

15 posted on 11/10/2003 7:41:57 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BlueString
Well...another way to look at this would be to burn large quantities of low sulfur coal at a central power facility and pipe the energy to where its needed via electric lines.
16 posted on 11/10/2003 7:42:46 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Hydrogen fuel cells could work tomorrow IF we develop another workable energy source, namely nuclear power.

The best way to accomplish that would be to shoot all the wacko environmentalists into the sun.

17 posted on 11/10/2003 7:43:29 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
I don't see why since you can do it with a $.55 battery.

But maybe you're right.
18 posted on 11/10/2003 7:45:52 AM PST by BlueString
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
I'll say it again. The most efficient method of storing and transporting hydrogen energy is to chemically bond the hydrogen to carbon atoms, forming ethane, methane, propane, octane. Coal, oil, and gas.
19 posted on 11/10/2003 7:52:12 AM PST by Fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
You are right. Free Hydrogen in any quantity needs to be stored at high-pressure, in a heavy metal container to hold the pressure.

I'll bet if we had started with a hydrogen economy, everyone would be trying to develop a nice liquid form (like gasoline or diesel) so it could be carried more efficiently and safely.

20 posted on 11/10/2003 7:58:43 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson