Skip to comments.
The Culture Wars Reach the Culture
Opinion Journal ^
| 11/10/03
| ROBERT L. BARTLEY
Posted on 11/09/2003 9:09:29 PM PST by Pokey78
Edited on 04/23/2004 12:06:06 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
We hit a milestone with CBS's canceling of "The Reagans."
CBS blinked.
We hit a milestone in the culture wars last week with the internment of the threatened Ronald Reagan hit job. For once, perhaps for the first time, one of our pre-eminent cultural institutions conceded that the great unwashed had it right. Instead of wrapping itself in the First Amendment right to be irresponsible, the network looked for the least graceless way out.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bigmedia; boycott; boycottviacom; cbs; cbsviacom; culturewar; lyingliars; mediabias; mtv; nick; ratherbiased; reaganbashing; robertlbartley; showtime; spike; thereagans; tnn; tvland; vh1; viacom; viacommie; viacomradio; workoffiction
1
posted on
11/09/2003 9:09:30 PM PST
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
This is the kind of story that would normally be consigned to page A14 of the New York Times, as indeed it was. But instead of dying there, it's been kept alive by other news outlets, notably Fox News.I hope it continues to be kept alive. My impression is that it's cooling off though...even with FOX. Hope I'm wrong.
Prairie
2
posted on
11/09/2003 9:13:05 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(Brought to you by The American Democratic Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
To: prairiebreeze
The key to the collapse of the leftist monopoly isn't FOXN, though that has been helpful. We are sitting in front of the medium that brought it down - the internet.
No, most people aren't going to read FR.com, AS.com, NRO.com, etc, but enough people are getting and recieving straight information through the internet that it has formed a critical mass.
Consider, as a similar stories the fact that most Americans know the media has been trying to paint a very different picture then what is really going on in Iraq, and that after three years of manufaturing scandals, the leftists have yet to make one stick on the President.
The leftist gatekeepers no longer are...they now are merely one more source of information, and one that most Americans view with deep suspicion.
To: prairiebreeze
Close observers of Capitol Hill, too, are amazed at the "legs" being displayed by the disclosure of a Senate Intelligence Committee memo on how Democrats can use hearings to embarrass the president. This is the kind of story that would normally be consigned to page A14 of the New York Times, as indeed it was. I believe the Rumsfeld memo was front page news at the Slimes, even though there was nothing bad or incriminating. It should be the lead story, but I doubt that any of the big three covered it.
4
posted on
11/09/2003 9:52:16 PM PST
by
KC_Conspirator
(This space for rent)
To: Pokey78
"All the more so since he remains alive but unable to respond."You can always count on the left to attack the helpless. From Reagan to Pinochet, from Elian to Terri.
5
posted on
11/09/2003 10:57:11 PM PST
by
Bonaparte
To: Pokey78
More Dinos, fewer Rinos. Thats my advice.
To: Pokey78
The Reagan broadcast suggests that market forces may be more powerful than democratic ones.Huh? Market forces are largely democratic. Maybe this should have been
The Reagan broadcast suggests that market forces may be more powerful than Democratic ones.
7
posted on
11/09/2003 11:19:02 PM PST
by
KayEyeDoubleDee
(const tag& constTagPassedByReference)
To: Pokey78
The Ford Foundation funds a gaggle of Islamic charities... It is only a small step for The Ford Foundation to fund a "charity" that will support the insurgency against the U.S. in Iraq.
The best, and perhaps only, way for the Left to regain the Presidency, is for there to be more U.S. KIA.
Can we put it past them?
8
posted on
11/09/2003 11:21:23 PM PST
by
Plutarch
To: swilhelm73
The key to the collapse of the leftist monopoly isn't FOXN, though that has been helpful. We are sitting in front of the medium that brought it down - the internet. No, most people aren't going to read FR.com, AS.com, NRO.com, etc, but enough people are getting and receiving straight information through the internet that it has formed a critical mass. The key question in my mind is, Whether websites like this can be used to efficiently and effectively to marshal a critical mass at the decision point when a policy recommendation, media coverage, etc., is truly objectionable -- because it is wrongheaded, unfair or dishonest? The corollary principle is that it cannot be overused.
9
posted on
11/10/2003 6:03:28 AM PST
by
OESY
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson