Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Congressman Billybob
Question for you: Hillary has a problem. She doesn't want to run now, BUT she doesn't want Dean to control the party. It is interesting to me that two weeks after Dean made his remarks about cleaning house at the DNC and how they needed fresh faces, Wesley Clark suddenly had an overwhelming urge to run -- with lots of former clintonistas running the show.

Clark has completely imploded, (unless he and Hillary do the democrat "vote for the stalking horse" shuffle.) Does she get around that by having Clark as Deans VP pick, how much input would a VP nominee have on who is running the party? I think Hillary strongly prefers NOT to run, but Dean seems to realize how much damage the Clintons, and particularly McAuliff, have done to the party and Dean wants them gone. How does Hillary balance letting Dean run and lose vs. possibly losing control of the party? I don't understand enough about how the Dems structure their party to know what the smart strategery might be.

115 posted on 11/09/2003 4:15:12 PM PST by justanotherfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: justanotherfreeper
How does Hillary balance letting Dean run and lose vs. possibly losing control of the party?

Hillary will control the Party no matter who wins the nomination. She is the Rat leader. That's where they get their money. Fast Eddie Rendell and Bill Richardson are the other big dogs in Rat circles. They're on board with Hillary too. None of those folks is going to take orders from any of the dwarfs.

116 posted on 11/09/2003 4:22:24 PM PST by JohnnyZ (Red Sox in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson