Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zionist Conspirator
If one is going to talk about slavery in Jewish law, then one has to include the laws that are incumbent upon a slave owner. The result was that slavery becomes so repugnant to the owner of a slave that few if any wanted to be a master of one.

There is a saying that, One who aquires a slave for himself also aquires a master.

This also includes the knowledge that in Jubilee years that all slaves were set free. That would be every 50 years. If one aquired a slave the year prior to a Jubilee year, he would have to release that slave the next year. In addition, the master is responsible for the total well being of the slave and would be held accountable for it under the law.

The laws of Jewish slavery are not simple and have consequences for both slave and master.

65 posted on 11/11/2003 12:57:24 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Nachum
The laws of Jewish slavery are not simple and have consequences for both slave and master.

No argument there. But I wince whenever people rip islam for "theocracy," "intolerance," "backwardness," etc., which are also found in the Torah.

The point is, all the Laws of the Torah are eternal, no matter how out of step with the contemporary world. Rabbi Yirmiyahu Bindman deals with these theoretical laws of slavery and polygyny (more than one wife) as they apply to non-Jews in his book, The Seven Colors of the Rainbow.

66 posted on 11/11/2003 3:55:09 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator ("Palaeoconservatives" are national relativists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson