Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

...reveals just how much of a threat to Microsoft's bottom line security flaws now represent.

For the first time, it seemed, flaws in Microsoft's software were translating into flaws in the company's business model.

About time.

1 posted on 11/08/2003 11:34:09 PM PST by zeugma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rdb3
Penguin Ping Please
2 posted on 11/08/2003 11:34:55 PM PST by zeugma (If you eat a live toad first thing in the morning, nothing worse will happen all day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeugma
Considering Steve Ballmer's more recent remarks, I'm not about to take any claim of heightened security at Microsoft seriously...

See: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1002404/posts

See also:


3 posted on 11/08/2003 11:38:32 PM PST by Prime Choice (The judiciary is supposed to be 1/3rd of the checks and balances; not a special interest trump card.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeugma
RedHat anyone????
4 posted on 11/08/2003 11:47:48 PM PST by clee1 (Where's the beef???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeugma
bump
13 posted on 11/09/2003 5:25:03 AM PST by Chief_Joe (From where the sun now sits, I will fight on -FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeugma
Microsoft is itself responsible for this situation. They created an architecture which allows executable content to be placed on machines without the consent of the user. They papered it over with a transparently flawed content-signing model.

Microsoft has been negligent. By ignoring the obvious consequences of their decisions on customers, a court might find them to have been civilly or criminally negligent.

Why did it happen? Because Microsoft managers are in it for the money only, are short sighted, and are more concerned with surviving in the organization long enough to vest their stock options, than in being customer or even corporate advocates.

Who will suffer? Well, we all will. But ultimately, Microsoft will, and its preeminence will be lost.
14 posted on 11/09/2003 6:12:08 AM PST by Tax Government
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeugma
wariness could prompt companies to delay software upgrades from every third to every fourth year

That's what I expect. This effect will probably kick the serious revenue from Longhorn down the calendar another year or so. By the time Longhorn comes out, most of the Bad Stuff will have been wrung out of Windows 2003 server and the virus-writers will be finding it tougher to find new holes in it. The first few guys who put Longhorn out there will get whacked a few times, and everybody knows it. Most people will hang back and wait to see how many arrows in the back the pioneers get.

18 posted on 11/09/2003 11:07:56 AM PST by Nick Danger (With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeugma
All I can say is....

awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

25 posted on 11/09/2003 5:48:28 PM PST by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeugma
Don't worry, the UN wants to get involved with privacy and security on the internet, to help out companies like MS (not meant to be funny either).
39 posted on 11/11/2003 7:42:54 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

It's greed that threatens Microsoft

I found out today that after paying hundreds of $$ for xp pro, that I cannot use it on more than one computer

IN MY OWN HOME

I now join the ever growing ranks of Americans who will never again buy a MS product.

41 posted on 11/11/2003 7:44:40 AM PST by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeugma

Z,

I have been all over the internet tonight: Kim Komando, Ad Alarm, Symantec, Norton, etc etc etc

Maybe you can help a frustrated FReeper:

Here's what happened. A couple of months ago, I noticed that my Norton no longer flashed the warning I was accustomed to seeing, "virus detected; please quarantine, or delete" (or whatever it said). This included periodic notices from the typical "Microsoft":

"Download this patch now", accompanied by an attachment. Which I knew not to open.

At about the same time, I stopped receiving emails from people who would call saying they had sent one to me (Locked up, apparently.) I called the local computer company. They ran Spybot, Symantec/Norton, and AdAware for two days. Finally told me they had isolated a virus that most programs had missed. He said there is a new virus which blocks anti-detection efforts, and actually 'disables' programs such as Norton. Two weeks later the technician returned, and I told him since his last visit, that I still get the typical Microsoft notice, I do not open it, nor does it show up as a virus. But it does not show up as previously with the red flashing warning. Again, he had said on the earlier visit that a new virus is out there which disables Norton and other detection methods.

He checked again and found nothing, but I am probably disabled from Norton insofar as I can ascertain. When I go to Kim Komando, Norton, et al, there is really not a place to enter a question and to receive a response via email.

I tried some external PC checks also such as Panda, but nothing showed up.

My question: Should I leave Norton and go to MacAfee or some other company?

ANY response, or sharing of my question with those having expertise, is MUCH appreciated!


43 posted on 09/15/2004 9:18:13 PM PDT by ZOTnot ("The burden of Damascus." I'll take the side of Israel, thank you.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zeugma

Z,

I have been all over the internet tonight: Kim Komando, Ad Alarm, Symantec, Norton, etc etc etc

Maybe you can help a frustrated FReeper:

Here's what happened. A couple of months ago, I noticed that my Norton no longer flashed the warning I was accustomed to seeing, "virus detected; please quarantine, or delete" (or whatever it said). This included periodic notices from the typical "Microsoft":

"Download this patch now", accompanied by an attachment. Which I knew not to open.

At about the same time, I stopped receiving emails from people who would call saying they had sent one to me (Locked up, apparently.) I called the local computer company. They ran Spybot, Symantec/Norton, and AdAware for two days. Finally told me they had isolated a virus that most programs had missed. He said there is a new virus which blocks anti-detection efforts, and actually 'disables' programs such as Norton. Two weeks later the technician returned, and I told him since his last visit, that I still get the typical Microsoft notice, I do not open it, nor does it show up as a virus. But it does not show up as previously with the red flashing warning. Again, he had said on the earlier visit that a new virus is out there which disables Norton and other detection methods.

He checked again and found nothing, but I am probably disabled from Norton insofar as I can ascertain. When I go to Kim Komando, Norton, et al, there is really not a place to enter a question and to receive a response via email.

I tried some external PC checks also such as Panda, but nothing showed up.

My question: Should I leave Norton and go to MacAfee or some other company?

ANY response, or sharing of my question with those having expertise, is MUCH appreciated!


44 posted on 09/15/2004 9:18:16 PM PDT by ZOTnot ("The burden of Damascus." I'll take the side of Israel, thank you.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson