Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ben Chad
Well, Ben Chad, I don't know if my ancestors condemned Galileo or not, but I do not. I have been unable to trace my ancestry prior to 1793. Opposing "scientific" evolution is not necessarily a point of religion. Did you explain where the "missing links" are found? I don't think they have turned up.
16 posted on 11/08/2003 3:55:56 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Theodore R.
What happened to the "missing link"?

As scientific hoaxes go, few have matched it. Sometime early in the 20th century, someone -- it is still unclear who -- "salted" a gravel pit near the town of Piltdown, England, with what were purported to be the 500,000-year-old fossil remains of a human ancestor -- half human, half ape.

The timing couldn't have been better. Darwin's "Origin of Species" was barely 50 years old, the French and Germans had found Neanderthals, and the race was on to discover the storied "missing link" in the evolution from apes to humans.

"In Britain we had some early modern humans, but nothing really old," paleoanthropologist Chris Stringer said in a telephone interview from his office in Britain's Natural History Museum. "There were stone tools, though, so there was almost a national expectation that we should have something."

And suddenly, there it was. Piltdown Man made his appearance in 1912 and held a place of honor in the museum until Nov. 21, 1953, when a new generation of scientists announced that the famous fossil was a fraud.

[See the original article for the rest: HERE.]


Excerpted - click for full article ^
17 posted on 11/08/2003 4:17:09 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson