Skip to comments.
Moscow considers kissing ban
BBC ^
| Nov 8, 2003
Posted on 11/08/2003 9:14:33 AM PST by Akira
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
...particularly blatant cases could even lead to a spell of temporary detention in jail...
Blatant kisses, as opposed to...?
1
posted on
11/08/2003 9:14:34 AM PST
by
Akira
To: Akira
Wait til Bloomberg hears of this new use of power !
To: Akira
Next they'll outlaw vidka.
3
posted on
11/08/2003 9:16:25 AM PST
by
martin_fierro
(_____oooo_(_°_¿_°_)_oooo_____)
To: martin_fierro
Vidka, vodka, whatever. <|:)~
4
posted on
11/08/2003 9:16:46 AM PST
by
martin_fierro
(_____oooo_(_°_¿_°_)_oooo_____)
To: martin_fierro
"Vidka, vodka, whatever. <|:)~"
Did you have a few screwdrivers to start your day?, hahahaha
5
posted on
11/08/2003 9:23:29 AM PST
by
AlexW
To: Akira
the Orwellian level of an anti-sexual league and capital punishment for the offenceI dunno. Maybe Orwellian. But Huxleylike totalitarianism seemed to endorse lascivious behavior. I think this is technicaly more "Puritanical" than "Orwellian."
6
posted on
11/08/2003 9:26:44 AM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: Akira
I must have been asleep. When did the Chechnyan "rebels" win their struggle and take over Moscow?
7
posted on
11/08/2003 9:28:38 AM PST
by
bluefish
To: Akira
the plan was aimed at raising levels of public morality Oh no, not public morality, only immorality will do.
8
posted on
11/08/2003 9:35:43 AM PST
by
sd-joe
To: Akira
They could have used this ban at my high school!!!
9
posted on
11/08/2003 9:40:20 AM PST
by
EsclavoDeCristo
(So you say you're a Catholic, well LIVE IT!)
To: All
I wonder how they feel about this?
Or this?
10
posted on
11/08/2003 9:46:15 AM PST
by
Kaslin
To: Akira
Tatyana Maskimova = MY VITA: A SATAN AMOK
11
posted on
11/08/2003 9:50:54 AM PST
by
aruanan
To: sam_paine
I dunno. Maybe Orwellian. But Huxleylike totalitarianism seemed to endorse lascivious behavior. I think this is technicaly more "Puritanical" than "Orwellian." Brave New World indeed!
To: StatesEnemy
Kissing to become in Russia?
Then only 1920 movies will be shown when kissing was implied but not displayed in love scenes:
To: sam_paine
sam_paine said: I dunno. Maybe Orwellian. But Huxleylike totalitarianism seemed to endorse lascivious behavior. I think this is technicaly more "Puritanical" than "Orwellian."
Another aspect of "Orwellian" control is that the control is arbitrary. One day the nation is aligned with "Oceania" and the next day opposed. The people were expected to adapt to the changed allegiances and controls without question. The state which can prohibit kissing in public can also mandate it. That which is not prohibited becomes required.
I believe it is in Missouri that the state constitution enumerates the right to keep and bear arms but which contains a clause that such right "shall not justify the carrying of concealed weapons". A judge has ruled that this clause prohibits carrying of concealed weapons. The "thinking" (if it can be called that) is that whatever is not a protected right must therefor be prohibited even with legislative approval.
From
1984 by George Orwell:
The aim of the Party was not merely to prevent men and women from forming loyalties which it might not be able to control. Its real, undeclared purpose was to remove all pleasure from the sexual act. Not love so much as eroticism was the enemy, inside marriage as well as outside it. All marriages between Party members had to be approved by a committee appointed for the purpose, and -- though the principle was never clearly stated -- permission was always refused if the couple concerned gave the impression of being physically attracted to one another. The only recognized purpose of marriage was to beget children for the service of the Party. Sexual intercourse was to be looked on as a slightly disgusting minor operation, like having an enema. This again was never put into plain words, but in an indirect way it was rubbed into every Party member from childhood onwards. There were even organizations such as the Junior Anti-Sex League, which advocated complete celibacy for both sexes. All children were to be begotten by artificial insemination (artsem, it was called in Newspeak) and brought up in public institutions. This, Winston was aware, was not meant altogether seriously, but somehow it fitted in with the general ideology of the Party. The Party was trying to kill the sex instinct, or, if it could not be killed, then to distort it and dirty it. He did not know why this was so, but it seemed natural that it should be so. And as far as the women were concerned, the Party's efforts were largely successful.
To: belmont_mark; RusIvan; RussianConservative
PING!
Russia is so free and so democratic ... Just look at Putin and his flat tax ... nevermind that Russians would even consider throwing you in jail until you pay a 10-17$ fine for kissing in public ...
16
posted on
11/10/2003 3:59:54 PM PST
by
Orion78
(Who died and made you thread monitor?)
To: Orion78
Orion but it is stupid hoax. Never no major of no city will pass such of legislature. He just kill himself politically. Anyone russian will make joke of him for many years to come.
They will call him a gay, a lame head or just old virgin. All these are strong dirides so they destroy man's reputation so no one will vote for him including womaen. No russian woman wil vote for the old virgin or gay. No way.
17
posted on
11/10/2003 6:52:22 PM PST
by
RusIvan
To: Orion78
To bad, better hurry to Moscow and inform all teenagers in Victory Park to stop kissing.
To: Orion78
Oh and paranoid, first this just legistlature and not ban and I really surprised if it ever pass...also, consider that in many US county also ban on public display of affection, on breast feeding babies and of even having alcohol or dare drink on own property and piss off fundimentalist neighbors...go cry me river.
To: Akira
Moscovites caught kissing in public places could be fined...What about if they're kissed in their private places?
20
posted on
11/10/2003 9:27:17 PM PST
by
Consort
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson