Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Call To Action: Dump Celibacy
Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel ^ | 11/8/03 | Tom Heinen

Posted on 11/08/2003 6:58:17 AM PST by ninenot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last
To: BlessedBeGod
You could very well be right. And Jesus did tell disciples to give up their wealth and turn their backs on their families.

Of course, there's this..

Peter, the first pope, and the apostles that Jesus
 chose were, for the most part, married men.

41 posted on 11/08/2003 9:08:28 AM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
It is if it's not within marriage. And I think there's no doubt that if our Lord had married it would have been mentioned in the Bible.

The Gospels provide no basis for that assumption. They say nothing about Jesus between the ages of about 13 and 30. They also say very little about what Jesus said and did between the Resurrection and the Ascension. These are huge and unaccountable omissions; obviously the Gospels did leave out a great deal, which certainly could have included Jesus being maried.

42 posted on 11/08/2003 9:10:45 AM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
1,970 years of Catholic tradition tells us so. If that is not good enough for you, see ya!

If you think that saying something over and over again makes it true, you must be one of those people who buy a lot of junk from TV infomercials

43 posted on 11/08/2003 9:14:32 AM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
I suspect that most of the priests who agitate for clerical marriage are not themselves the marrying kind.
44 posted on 11/08/2003 9:15:03 AM PST by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
These are huge and unaccountable omissions; obviously the Gospels did leave out a great deal, which certainly could have included Jesus being maried.

Don't most people consider marriage (along with birth and death) to be one of the most significant events in a person's life? The Bible certainly speaks highly of the institution.

45 posted on 11/08/2003 9:17:45 AM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
I suppose it's no use arguing with you, but there's no historical basis whatever to claim that any of the apostles were married. It's a story made up out of whole cloth for ideological purposes.

The problem with Call to Action, Voice of the Faithful, and others who label themselves as "reformers" is that they don't really belong in the Catholic Church.

If they want homosexual priests, women priests, and married priests, they should look elsewhere. But they want all these things while still hanging onto their little shreds of power and money which they continue to get by leaching off the Church they abuse.

As an American, you can believe whatever you want, but then you should go where your beliefs take you.
46 posted on 11/08/2003 9:18:29 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
Oh, please. If our Lord had married it would have been considered a MAJOR event in his life and would have been documented.
47 posted on 11/08/2003 9:22:16 AM PST by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
You mean like Jesus did?

In the culture at the time, it would not have been considered a "sin" in the usual sense. The virginity of a man was not considered something that needed to be preserved for either religious or social reasons. Therefore, I see no reason to exclude the possibility that Jesus had sex, and it seems to me it would be more likely than not.

48 posted on 11/08/2003 9:22:54 AM PST by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
The Seventh Commandment didn't exist at the time?
49 posted on 11/08/2003 9:24:04 AM PST by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
Are you saying he sinned?

Not if he was married.

50 posted on 11/08/2003 9:24:42 AM PST by Oztrich Boy (You realize, of course, this means war?" B Bunny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Well, this is from the same source you disbelieve, but here it is anyway

306-Council of Elvira, Spain, decree #43: a priest who sleeps with
 his wife the night before Mass will lose his job.

...which tells me, along with the previous post, that married priests and apostles and popes
were good enough for Jesus and good enough until at least three hundred years later.  The
'tradition' seems entirely manmade and late in the game.

Oh, and believe me, regardless of the existential consequences, I go where my rationality takes me, leading up to my beliefs.

51 posted on 11/08/2003 9:24:55 AM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
Chapter and verse documenting he was married?
52 posted on 11/08/2003 9:25:10 AM PST by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
I see no reason to exclude the possibility that Jesus had sex, and it seems to me it would be more likely than not.

Does it seem to you he had sex with a prostitute, a married woman or a single woman?

53 posted on 11/08/2003 9:27:02 AM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Make sure to ask tortoise if he believes Christ is the Son of God, also.
54 posted on 11/08/2003 9:27:54 AM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
And I know you are aware that Call to Action is a dissenting organization. CTA does NOT represent the views of the Catholic Church

But many others do not know this. For those I ask that you please check out the link above by clicking on dissent and then organizations.

55 posted on 11/08/2003 9:33:37 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
If you are not Catholic, why on earth do you care how we govern our own Church and whatever makes you think it is is any of your business?
Because our entire society -- not just the Catholic church -- is hurt when someone is molested by pedophile priests who would not have been in office were it not for the fact that the Roman Catholic church continues to preserve a decidedly non-biblical man-made practice that was not practiced by the early Church. Jesus told the religious leaders of his time that they should not place burdens upon men that they couldn't carry.

I have a LOT of good things to say about the Roman Catholic church, so don't call me a Catholic-basher or anything like that. However, when a practice is wrong, you have to throw it out, just like the Catholic church finally quit the practice of selling indulgences, though its reluctance in doing so created a schism in the process.

Want another schism? Then keep on perpetuating the man-made doctrine of priestly celibacy which is nothing more than a Gnostic heresy continued into the 21st century.

"The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron. They forbid people to marry and order them to abstain from certain foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and who know the truth."  1 Timothy 4:1-3

"Don't we have the right to take a believing wife along with us, as do the other apostles and the Lord's brothers and Peter?"  1 Corinthians 9:5
 


56 posted on 11/08/2003 9:37:09 AM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod
If our Lord had married it would have been considered a MAJOR event in his life and would have been documented.

Really.So there were no "major events" in His life between the ages of 13 and 30?

Those weren't recorded, were they?

You're making unfounded assumptions based on an uncritical acceptance of a certain tradition

57 posted on 11/08/2003 9:38:19 AM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
To the tyrants never yield!
58 posted on 11/08/2003 9:38:40 AM PST by Cap'n Crunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
Make sure you address the occurence of pedophila in the Protestant denominations,also. You will have to explain why the absence of the celibacy requirement does not prevent pedophilia from occuring at the same frequency as in the Catholic Church. Or didn't you know that?
59 posted on 11/08/2003 9:40:56 AM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: WackyKat
You're making unfounded assumptions based on an uncritical acceptance of a certain tradition

You're the one making unfounded assumptions that if a major event like that took place it wouldn't be in the Bible. I can't imagine a bigger event than that which would have taken place during that age range which would have been documented instead.

His first miracle occurred at a wedding -- that's how important he thought it was. It wasn't just a photo op, you know.

60 posted on 11/08/2003 9:42:10 AM PST by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson