To: daylate-dollarshort
1,374 posted on
11/10/2003 9:06:30 PM PST by
iowamomforfreedom
(Why is it illegal to starve an animal but not a human being?)
To: iowamomforfreedom
Were these things happening with Christine? Were her food and water failing to arrest a disease or causing her serious side effects or extreme suffering? On the contrary, her food and water were giving her the only benefit they have to offer. They were keeping her alive in a fairly comfortable, healthy state. This is all food and water can do for anybody; they do not cure brain damage. How, then, could Christine's food and water be considered "futile," "ineffective," "excessively burdensome," and "not beneficial"? [from Wishing People Dead]
1,376 posted on
11/10/2003 9:22:56 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
("Across this great nation people pray -- do not put out her flame" -- DFU. Go Godsquad!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson