Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cpforlife.org
I have been voting pro-life since 1980 and I have been constantly frustrated by the lack of real progress in this concern. So during the 2000 election campaign I was shocked to read in New York magazine about the former college roomate of GW Bush who was running the campaign in New York for GW. And guess what, he was a Democrat! And he was pro-choice! They quoted him as saying that he wasn't worrried about George doing anything about Roe.

And therein lies the rub. Good Catholics vote pro-choice, why not they practice contraception. It all comes down to economics. I agree with Chesterton and what he said about Capitalism as it is practiced. It is the emeny of the family.

55 posted on 11/07/2003 8:06:47 PM PST by RichardMoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: RichardMoore
So, who do you suppose was lying......this Democrat NY guy, or the President, Chuck Colson and Jerry Falwell?

I'm guessing the NY Dem, because right now, the pro abortion folks are scared to death about the future of Roe v. Wade.......and with good reason.

58 posted on 11/07/2003 8:19:17 PM PST by ohioWfan (Have you prayed for your President today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: RichardMoore
Thanks Richard. Yes indeed, it's EXTREMLY frustrating.

Two points:

"They quoted him as saying that he wasn't worried about George doing anything about Roe."

That would be confirmed by Ari Fleshier who said-at a press conference-when he was the spokesman that W is "personally against" abortion" but will not be specifically fighting it as Prez.

Point two: Chesterton, in addition, condemned contraception as wicked and an enemy of the family.

63 posted on 11/07/2003 8:34:58 PM PST by cpforlife.org (The Missing Key of the Pro-Life Movement is at www.CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: RichardMoore
Capitalism as it is practiced. It is the enemy of the family.

Chesterton was nearly always right, wasn't he. Think of nursing homes today. People will put aging parents in nursing homes to avoid the inconvenience of caring for them in their own homes. Also, they be able to get government to pay for the nursing home expenses, but they would be out-of-pocket for some of the expenses if the infirmed were kept at home with the Baby Boomers.

Similarly, some abort for "financial" reasons, not realizing that the child in the womb could become a financ ial wizard who would make the whole family "rich" in money if not in grace.
92 posted on 11/07/2003 9:22:21 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson