Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
"This should never have been published!" a top newsroom source explained Friday evening.

Lyall reported: "No one would say what the rumor was. Not the British newspapers, which were writing long, innuendo-laced articles about it. Not the television commentators, who were discussing it with acrobatic opacity. Especially not Prince Charles, who seemed to be hoping it would just go away...

"The allegation (although no one has said so publicly) has to do with purported sexual contact between Prince Charles, the heir to the throne, and Michael Fawcett, one of his closest advisers." Developing..."

10 posted on 11/07/2003 1:49:05 PM PST by Flux Capacitor (Jindal 2003!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Flux Capacitor
Really though, folks, give Chuck a break.... after a decade and a half of THIS,
there are far more bizarre things he could have turned to.

-Dan
30 posted on 11/07/2003 1:58:51 PM PST by Flux Capacitor (Jindal 2003!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Flux Capacitor
So the story is Prince Charles' gay lover raped another man and the Royal Family is covering it up? Sound like Democrat Family Values.
70 posted on 11/07/2003 2:23:58 PM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson