Skip to comments.
Could the Flurry of Geomagnetic Storms Increase the Chances of a Major Volcanic Eruption or Quake?
Chief WSI/INTELLICAST Meteorologist ^
| November 6, 2003
| Joe D'Aleo
Posted on 11/07/2003 1:09:55 PM PST by FireTrack
The powerful geomagnetic storms of late October disrupted communications, caused spotty power outages and produced beautiful aurora displays even to mid latitudes.
At virtually every moment in time, there are active volcanoes producing tremors or lava flows or gas and ash emissions. Major volcanic eruptions are rarer. Their frequency is more like one per decade or even longer.
Volcanic eruptions certainly have direct, local, sometimes devastating effects and the larger ones have been shown to have an influence on the world's weather. The last major eruptions were in the early 1990s (Pinatubo and Cerro Hudson). The two biggest eruptions before that occurred about 10 years earlier (Mt. St. Helens and El Chichon). These eruptions spewed a large amount of ash, gas and aerosols into the stable, high atmosphere.
(Excerpt) Read more at intellicast.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: geomagnetic; quake; volcano
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Not sure how the two are related but it appears they are based on the chart he has prepared.
1
posted on
11/07/2003 1:09:56 PM PST
by
FireTrack
To: FireTrack
For all we know the entire solar system is under an influence and the sun is showing it off more brightly than any other body.
2
posted on
11/07/2003 1:11:21 PM PST
by
Naspino
(I am in no way associated with the views expressed in your posts.)
To: RadioAstronomer; Sabertooth
ping
3
posted on
11/07/2003 1:13:05 PM PST
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: FireTrack
Quite a stretch, if you ask me. (I know, you didn't.)
If there was a connection, you would think the bigger the peak in the ash chart, the bigger the peak in the mag storm chart, but that is not the case:

He's asking you to believe that a 2.7 peak in1962 caused a 0.01 ash figure, but a 3.0 peak in 1991 casue a 0.15 ash figure. But a 3.01 peak in 1989 caused NO ash peak?
I'm not buying it.
4
posted on
11/07/2003 1:21:18 PM PST
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: blam; aristeides
Pingaroo...
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: FireTrack
I don't think so. The two/three events are not related. Sun spots (storms) are a result of activity on/within the sun (nuclear fusion). Volcanoes and earthquakes result from tectonic plate movements. Don't forget to throw in the lunar eclipse due to happen tomorrow night. Better start doing some "small animal sacrifice" to ward off the evil spirits.
Not related - no cause & effect - move on.
To: FireTrack
To: FireTrack
There is no causative physical connection between the events.
9
posted on
11/07/2003 1:33:40 PM PST
by
spunkets
To: FireTrack
I don't see it. If a chart of the DJIA were included for comparison, then, maybe.
10
posted on
11/07/2003 1:38:05 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Close your tag lines)
To: RightWhale
"I don't see it. If a chart of the DJIA were included for comparison, then, maybe."
LOL
Hmmmmm, I bet someone is looking into that right now!
Nice lighting you guys had up there a couple of weeks back. I just returned from Anchorage and wanted to thank you for arranging it for me. ;-)
To: FireTrack
Absolutely they are related. I've watched this for years and incidences of quakes AND volcanic events do cluster around major solar events. Of course they happen at other times, but the relationship is easily demonstrable.
Mechanism is most likely energy from the interplanetary shock wave of a large flare and especially its CME being coupled into the geosphere through the magnetosphere.
Even a small CME has a mass greater then thousands of Enterprise Class Aircraft Carriers.
12
posted on
11/07/2003 2:06:43 PM PST
by
EUPHORIC
(Right? Left? Read Ecclesiastes 10:2 for a definition. The Bible knows all about it!)
To: EUPHORIC
"Absolutely they are related"
I tend to believe they are related somehow, based on his charts (if they are accurate). I like your theory and think it's worth pursuing!
To: Domestic Church
I'm doubtful but, open minded. I wonder why they didn't go back in time some more, surely we have the data.
14
posted on
11/07/2003 2:58:31 PM PST
by
blam
To: spunkets
Well what if there is some causative component that we haven't considered or even be aware of. Perhaps geomagnetic storms don't cause volcanic activity, but perhaps there is something else that causes both. Some kind of ripple in the space-time fabric or something that causes unusual activity in the sun and on earth.
15
posted on
11/07/2003 3:04:54 PM PST
by
DannyTN
To: ravingnutter
"A Monster Awakens (Yellowstone)?"
WOW
What did we ever do before FR came along???
Thanks for posting this!
To: DannyTN
Volcanic activity is caused by all the various forces involved in plate tectonics. They all arise locally here on Earth.
Here's a link and there's more on google. The sun's mass ejections amount to something insignificant as far as driving forces go here on Earth.
Those plots shown in reply #4 look funny. The top one has an illegible abscissa and the bottom one has an abitrary, nonlinear scale, that isn't a log scale. I still see no link even without that consideration, because the forces involved are many orders of magnitude different. I doubt the Sun's mass ejections even have enough energy to act as a trigger except on the rarest occasion. That occasion though would be when the volcanic event was set up and ready to go by tectonic forces alone. Those forces don't follow the Sun's patterns of mass ejections, there's no linkage.
17
posted on
11/07/2003 3:34:17 PM PST
by
spunkets
To: FireTrack

Stolen from the BBC site
18
posted on
11/07/2003 3:35:37 PM PST
by
blam
To: FireTrack
Honey! Where is my asbestos suit?
19
posted on
11/07/2003 3:41:58 PM PST
by
Mat_Helm
To: ravingnutter
A Monster Awakens (Yellowstone)? If that cauldera blows...millions, from The Dakotas to Arkansas will die.
20
posted on
11/07/2003 3:42:07 PM PST
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson