Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
if female/female cannot be adultery because it isn't sexual intercourse, then sexual intercourse must = male/female coitus. Therefore, male to male is also not sexual intercourse seeing that it is lacking exactly one vagina. Two observations: (1) If you cannot commit adultery then you obviously cannot be married; (2) If you cannot be having sexual intercourse, then the best description of this act is as it's always been....sodomy.

Impeccable logic.

However, you are obviously unqualified to sit on the bench since you evidently believe words have assigned and compelling legal definitions.
228 posted on 11/10/2003 3:24:58 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: George W. Bush
Why, thank you GW.

From you, that is a high compliment. Logic is one of your strong suits.
229 posted on 11/10/2003 3:52:17 PM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson