Were they? The last judge I saw FR people going off on was an appointee of former president Bush with pretty good credentials. In that case, too, it looked like it was the legislature at fault.
Just because some judges in Texas want to play fast and loose with the law with a result that liberals love, doesn't mean some judges in New Hampshire coming up with a result liberals love is necessarily playing playing the law loose.
I don't know about you, but personally, and in every way I hear it used regularly, "sexual intercourse" requires a penis be in the equation somewhere. The law simply needs to be amended. Check your state law to see what would happen in a case like this.
Not any more, where have you been..dare I ask? The queers have a whole new set of rules, and nothing is what it used to be.
Do you think a BL@WJOB is sex, if so, and I am really going out on a limb with you, do you think that would be adultress? . . I thought so.. so how have the liberal judges found reasons to overturn our moral codes in this country and not seen that simple fact??? Not on my watch, you can run you game somewhere else.. sorry, all of my compassion was spent fighting off the foxes in our schools.. Have you no shame?.. LOL