The reports that have been made by the Army haven't glorified her involvement or portrayed her in some light that could be considered propoganda (as Pvt. Lynch asserted in the Diane Sawyer interview, which was the spark that lit this thread's fire).
As I have pointed out on this thread several times, when initially asked --during the whole "fog of war"-- the Army briefer (Gen. Brooks) informed the reporters that the Army expects all soldiers to fight and that it wouldn't be uncommon for a soldier to fire his weapon in the face of an aggressor (duh! but, to the spineless reporters that went to Columbia witha silver spoon in their mouth, this is actually news). He added, however, that they still were trying to find the details out.
The reporters (not the Army or the Pentagon) took the hardly known facts and extrapolated it into this "Saving Private Lynch"/"Rambo" tale.
The fact is that Pvt. Lynch suffered a terrible ordeal. We all wish that she hadn't gone through it. We all wish her as full a recovery (physical and mental) as possible. However, her comments were misdirected at the Pentagon.
She never said propaganda, she was referring to using her to boost morale. She was saying that they could've used the rescuers or others to do that. You guys are making a big deal out of nothing.