I don't see where she said that in the article. She says the video was used as a way "to symbolize all this stuff." Symbolize what stuff? The war? The rescue? It's not clear in the article, but the Daily News is spreading the word that she's angry at the Pentagon for using her for propaganda purposes. Whether the filming of her rescue was for morale, propaganda, or training purposes (probably all three), I still think she is wrong to criticize the military for doing so.
Good gosh, everything has to be laid out in fine detail for you. What do you think I meant by "morale"?
Symbolize what stuff? The war? The rescue? It's not clear in the article,...
Oh boy. She was speaking of morale.
...but the Daily News is spreading the word that she's angry at the Pentagon for using her for propaganda purposes. Whether the filming of her rescue was for morale, propaganda, or training purposes (probably all three), I still think she is wrong to criticize the military for doing so.
This same body of the article was posted 4 times last night, and there was no anger by you guys. It gets posted today with a different headline and you guys go ballistic. That tells me that the title is bull and made to show some kind of "anger" by Lynch toward the military. She is not angry at the military. She is hurt that half the nation (composed of you people) dislike her because of what was said by the Washington Post. And if it was me, I'd take out an ad ala Johnny Cash to those criticizing her, but I know she won't do that.