Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spunkets
You didn't comprehend all that was said. I meant what I said first and stick by it. Elaboration is not retraction.

It sure looked like a retraction. Well, then if you're calling her a liar again, you accuse on no evidence and you may be wrong anyway because of what I said about the jamming.

Yet you argue with someone who knows and gives you facts.

Because I've seen what men better than you have said. You have no credibility with me since you called Lynch a liar on no evidence.

The Army bolsters the image of it's members by speeking positively about them and assuming the actions of it's members were in accord with the highest traditions and honor. It's good for morale. The Army doesn't respond with what may in fact be more truthful initial assesments of incidents such as this one. It's seems PFC Lynch would have prefered that. Had they done so, she'd still be shooting off her mouth about something else.

You again accuse on no evidence. Because of what was said about her then, half the country composed of people like you dislike her now. I can understand her being hurt by that. I personally think she should flip you guys off, but I'm a hothead.

She PFC Lynch isn't focusing on America's intrest in ridding the region of Iraq of criminal ops and terrorists. Her focus is not on the interests of the US military and it's members performing the cleansing of the region. Her focus is on PFC Lynch and whatever mental wanderings are going on at the time she opens her mouth.

Accuse, accuse, accuse and there's no evidence to back what you say. You have no credibility whatsoever. She simply said she is hurt by what has been said about her.

She second guessed the reason they filmed her rescue and got it wrong. The Army does what it can to rescue it's POWs. Not only does the filming and written record of that op serve for training purposes. It serves as a morale booster for both the armed services and the American public, in the face of leftist detractors. So it can be viewed as propaganda, but to focus on that empty statement alone is really shameful.

You are shameful. You accuse on no evidence. That is very shameful.

291 posted on 11/07/2003 11:04:43 AM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]


To: #3Fan
Hmmmmm...........
292 posted on 11/07/2003 11:05:53 AM PST by BigBadBrian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]

To: #3Fan
"but I'm a hothead."

Well there's certainly a lack of focus and logic in your posts. You're saying that's just, because you're emotionally driven?

297 posted on 11/07/2003 11:18:07 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson