Don't think this is right. He is a PhD, and I think I even remember that his degree was, maybe, not completed? Don't know that for sure, but the statement makes him sound like a medical doctor which he certainly is not. Odd.
Given the myriad of ways in which single-piece rate First-Class Mail can be delayed, misrouted and "lost" until it finally reaches the 010 operation, there is no evidence to demonstrate that they were not all mailed September 7, 2001 at 6 PM (or thereabouts) after the last prayer of the day down at the local mosque used by the terrorist team in Boca Raton, FL.
They talked to Rosenberg, who talked and Rosenberg has no legal standing to withhold their names. This makes it sound as if the FBI went chasing after hearsay, without checking the sources.
In other words, her "evidence" is hearsay and wouldn't be usable in a court of law.
On September 18 the first of the anthrax letters was posted from Trenton, New Jersey.
NOT TRUE! The first letter was sent to American Media in South Florida. It was never recovered, but post offices in that area were contaminated. It was likely mailed somewhere in South Florida. More importantly, it MAY have been mailed before 9/11 since the earliest news reports said that American Media employees remembered the letter had arrived sometime around 9/8/01.
Because it was never recovered, exactly where and when it was mailed cannot be proven either way. But the media continually soft-soaps the Florida incident and the pretty strong circumstantial evidence connecting Atta and his gang to American Media and suspicious medical problems the hijackers were known to have in the weeks leading up to 9/11.
There was at least one other letter that was never recovered. It's the one that went to Dan Rather's office.
I think this case will never be solved because investigators have already made up their minds that it was just a coincidence that the anthrax attacks happened virtually simultaneously with the 9/11 attacks. They have their minds made up that the anthrax attacks were domestic terrorism. I think Spertzel is right, however.