To: cpforlife.org
"[O]ur evidence will show the court that this act unconstitutionally compromises a woman's right to reproductive choice hire a serial killer to murder an alive unborn child and it is designed to remove the abortion murder alternative(s)," Hut told the court, the Associated Press reports.
20 posted on
03/30/2004 6:05:05 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: MHGinTN
The sad thing is that pro-life activists believe they just have to convince others that a human life is at stake; the reality is that everyone knows this already, and some choose to disregard it.
In the US, you can be punished for destroying a bald eagles egg, but not a human one. The argument about "blobs of tissue" doesn't even rear its head; its simply against the law to destroy the bird's egg.
I guess its a case of priorities...
21 posted on
03/30/2004 6:12:13 PM PST by
Tuco Ramirez
(Ideas have consequences.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson