Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Velveeta
Really? Are we sure? If so, that might be another piece of the puzzle!

I know they are saying there would be tool marks, if she had been dismembered. But btw, somewhere in that testimony, they said he had a SAW lying there in that warehouse.
65 posted on 11/07/2003 11:21:18 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Devil_Anse
I'm sure! No saw marks, either.

AUTOPSY DIAGNOSES

1.) Female body with:

A. Absence of each radius, each ulna and both hands

B. Absence of both feet and left tibia and fibula

C. Absence of head and cervical vertebrae 1-6

D. Absence of thoracoabdominal viscera

2.) Gravid uterus: fetus, placenta and the umbilical cord absent, with opening
near fundus. Cervix intact and closed.

3.) Extensive changes of immersion, postmortem animal feeding, tidal effect
and decomposition, estimated postmortem interval : months

4.) Multiple rib fractures (left 5 and 6, right 9)

CAUSE OF DEATH UNDETERMINED

COMMENTS: The absence of body parts in this case may simply be attributable
to postmortem change, animal feeding, and tidal action , there is no evidence of
Tool marks on remaining bones of the extremites or on the thoracic vertebral
column. Toxicology testing performed on skeletal muscle is positive only for
caffeine and PEA (decomposition product.)
75 posted on 11/07/2003 11:38:21 AM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson