Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
[n-s 621] Are you suggesting that that official blessing was behind the alleged recognition of the confederate government? That the Union had no chance of Papal support because of the Emancipation Proclamation?

My 574 (to which you responded with your 576) was addressed to 4CJ (think MENSA) who does not share your difficulty in comprehension and therefore needed no explanation.

If you believe the pope gave papal support to the Confederacy by his bull of January 5, 1455, I do not believe I want to disturb your intellectual slumbers.

It would seem that the Wlat Brigade has abandoned its position that there was no diplomatic recognition and is now moaning about the nature of the diplomatic discourse.

642 posted on 11/19/2003 12:28:09 PM PST by nolu chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies ]


To: nolu chan
It would seem that the Wlat Brigade has abandoned its position that there was no diplomatic recognition and is now moaning about the nature of the diplomatic discourse.

Considering the US had diplomatice relations with the Vatican since 1848, I guess the only question can be that of how the Pope supported the Confederacy in 1455, or question the Pope's understanding of Greek fire.

644 posted on 11/19/2003 1:56:17 PM PST by 4CJ (Come along chihuahua, I want to hear you say yo quiero taco bell. - Nolu Chan, 28 Jul 2003)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson