[PeaRidge]

If I have this right, then Non-Seq would argue that in spite of the fact that Gustavus Fox presented his plan to invade Charleston Harbor to the Cabinet, that because the US Navy did not carry it out constitutes irrefutable evidence that Fox never supported the idea.

Interesting.

[stand watie]

very likely.

N-S is really "hung up" on the failure of the CSA to appoint a CSSC.

it is the nature of a propagandist AND nitpicker to get "wholly consumed" by MINOR details.

in formation of a supreme court was NOT the main focus of the CSA. the MAIN focus was to WIN THE WAR!

free dixie,sw

[Non-Sequitur]

If I have this right, then Non-Seq would argue that in spite of the fact that Gustavus Fox presented his plan to invade Charleston Harbor to the Cabinet, that because the US Navy did not carry it out constitutes irrefutable evidence that Fox never supported the idea.

You don't have it right. No surprise there.