Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Interesting, especially since the exact composition of Greek Fire has been lost for centuries.

Most likely it was a figurative reference to shells containing explosive chemical mixtures that rain fire and shrapnel down on their targets (i.e. gunpowder).

589 posted on 11/18/2003 11:26:23 AM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 585 | View Replies ]


To: GOPcapitalist
Most likely it was a figurative reference to shells containing explosive chemical mixtures that rain fire and shrapnel down on their targets (i.e. gunpowder).

Like what? What mixture did they have that did that? Canister was short range only, and the Union forces never got close enough to use that. The navy used solid shot and explosive shells in the Civil War. So did the army. These can't be confused with Greek Fire at all so unless the purpose was to be deliberately misleading I can't imagine where the confusion would come from. Considering some of Mr. Mann's other comments that is the most likely explanation.

591 posted on 11/18/2003 11:36:16 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson