Lock & Load!
1 posted on
11/06/2003 6:19:08 PM PST by
PsyOp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: PsyOp
bump
77 posted on
11/07/2003 2:20:20 PM PST by
groanup
(Whom the market gods humble they first make proud.)
To: PsyOp
**Bumpin a PsyOp thread**
Cool.
84 posted on
11/10/2003 7:32:03 PM PST by
nicollo
To: PsyOp
bttt
85 posted on
11/21/2003 2:50:38 PM PST by
Stew Padasso
(Head down over a saddle.)
To: PsyOp
90 posted on
02/02/2004 3:28:04 PM PST by
PsyOp
(Note to Jihadists: I profile and carry a gun.)
To: PsyOp
91 posted on
02/04/2004 11:35:36 AM PST by
PsyOp
(Note to Jihadists: I profile and carry a gun.)
To: PsyOp
Senior citizen pulls gun on knife-wielding robber "A senior citizen using the men's room yesterday at a popular Middletown eatery was approached by a would-be robber waving a knife. The potential victim responded by pulling out his own weapon - a handgun."
94 posted on
02/26/2004 3:44:54 PM PST by
PsyOp
(Do not take the first step without considering the last. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
To: PsyOp
Hillary Clinton Joins Americans For Gun Safety Foundation Campaign "Victims of domestic violence often don't get adequate protection from the criminal justice system when their abuser has a gun, advocates said Wednesday.
"A gun control group and a domestic violence center claim many women are slipping through the cracks because judges and police officers don't pay enough attention to the risks a gun poses in a volatile domestic violence case.
"Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., said Wednesday that the failure of officials to follow through on gun restrictions show "how difficult it is to get real protection out of a protective order."
"Clinton joined the Americans for Gun Safety Foundation and the National Network Against Domestic Violence, which are trying to pressure local, state, and federal authorities to strictly enforce the gun restrictions on protective orders."
95 posted on
03/11/2004 10:51:08 AM PST by
PsyOp
(The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
To: All
...the whole notion of marketing Kerry as sympathetic to gun owners has always been a tough sell. For someone like Howard Dean, the question was at least debatable. For Kerry, however, gun-control organizations have rated him as having a perfect record on gun control over his entire political career. Even this spring, when legislation to rein in abusive lawsuits against gun makers was voted on by the Senate, Kerry consistently supported gun-control efforts.Glorifying Guns?
96 posted on
04/22/2004 4:53:12 PM PDT by
PsyOp
(Self-defense is a part of the law of nature… even against the King himself. - Barclay.)
To: All
7. An intruder will be incapacitated by tear gas or oven spray, but if shot with a .357 Magnum will get angry and kill you.
40 Reasons For Gun Control
97 posted on
05/05/2004 12:06:35 PM PDT by
PsyOp
(Citizenship ought to be reserved for those who carry arms. – Aristotle.)
To: All
The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence (which is now affiliated with the Million Mom March) says on its website that "Uzi and AK-47 assault weapons" -- are "coming this summer to your neighborhood courtesy of George W. Bush unless you do something about it."Anti-Gun Campaign Accused of Spreading 'Hype'
98 posted on
05/20/2004 1:13:07 PM PDT by
PsyOp
(A nation can survive its fools…. But it cannot survive treason from within. – Cicero.)
To: PsyOp
99 posted on
08/16/2004 11:36:42 AM PDT by
PsyOp
(John Kerry—a .22 Rimfire Short in a .44 Magnum world.)
To: All
But the rules seem to matter very little in Sacramento. Shortly after voting to send the fifty caliber ban to a well-deserved grave, California Democrats called for a "re-vote" and we watched as a handful of Democrats pressed the vote button at their own desk, then calmly walked to the empty desk of another member of the Assembly and voted a second time. This, we learn, is what California Legislators call "Ghost Voting." Nobody there is shocked because "they do it all the time.""GHOST VOTES" OUTLAW .50 CALIBERS IN CALIFORNIA!
100 posted on
08/26/2004 4:24:37 PM PDT by
PsyOp
(John Kerry—a .22 Rimfire Short in a .44 Magnum world.)
To: PsyOp
With their typical spin, the Brady bunch has generated a panic among many unfamiliar with firearms and ballistics. The misinformation campaign involves a recently released product of Fabrique Nationale Herstal (FN), a Belgian firearms manufacturerthe Five seveN® semi-automatic pistoland the ammunition the gun fires....
In a statement issued Friday, the NRA quotes Mike Barnes, President of the Brady Campaign organization, at a press conference on March 3 as challenging NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre to put on a bullet proof vest, and we`ll fire the weapon at him, and see what happens." Publisher Calls Out Brady Bunch-Tells Sarah Brady, "Shoot me"
106 posted on
03/07/2005 11:47:06 AM PST by
PsyOp
(The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
To: All
Sarah Brady skirted gun laws in buying son's rifle New York Daily News, March 22, 2002
WASHINGTON - Gun-control advocate Sarah Brady bought her son a powerful rifle for Christmas in 2000 - and may have skirted Delaware state background-check requirements, the New York Daily News has learned.
Brady reveals in a new memoir that she bought James Brady Jr. a Remington .30-06, complete with scope and safety lock, at a Lewes, Del., gun shop.
"I can't describe how I felt when I picked up that rifle, loaded it into my little car and drove home," she writes. "It seemed so incredibly strange: Sarah Brady, of all people, packing heat."
Brady became a household name as a crusader for stricter gun-control laws after her husband, James, then the White House press secretary, was seriously wounded in a 1981 assassination attempt on then-President Ronald Reagan.
Brady writes in "A Good Fight" that the unnamed gun shop ran federal Brady Law and Delaware state background checks with great fanfare.
The book suggests that she did not have her son checked, as required by Delaware state law.
"(W)hen the owner called in the checks, it seemed to me he spoke unnecessarily loudly, repeating and spelling my name over and over on the phone," Brady writes.
Amy Stillwell, a spokeswoman for The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, said the federal Brady Law does not require background checks for intrafamily gun gifts.
Stillwell said she did not know whether her son was checked under the state law. The Delaware Department of Justice says the state does not have an exemption for family gifts.
"Scott is not a convicted felon, and he is not prohibited from owning a gun," Stillwell said. "Scott Brady could walk into a store and buy a - he is not a prohibited purchaser."
Delaware Justice Department spokeswoman Lori Sitler said the purchase could be illegal under state law if Brady did not also say who she was buying the gun for and submit his "name, rank and serial number" for a full check.
"You can't purchase a gun for someone else," Sitler said yesterday. "That would be a 'straw purchase.' You've got a problem right there."
Anti-gun control advocates were surprised to hear of Brady's foray into their world.
"We hope that it's innocuous and there's been no laws violated," said James Jay Baker, chief lobbyist for the National Rifle Association. "It's obviously interesting that Sarah would be purchasing firearms of any kind for anybody, given her championing of restrictive guns laws for everyone."
(c) 2002, New York Daily News. Visit the Daily News online at http://www.nydailynews.com/ Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.
Sarah Brady skirted gun laws in buying son's rifle
107 posted on
03/07/2005 11:56:29 AM PST by
PsyOp
(The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
To: PsyOp
108 posted on
03/08/2005 2:15:08 AM PST by
Abundy
To: All
"In a speech given to the National Rifle Association's national convention in Houston, Nugent brandished a pair of assault rifles while urging NRA members to recruit other gun-packing nuts into the gang. He went so far as to urge NRA members not to associate with non-members, and to become "hardcore, radical extrimists."
Ted Nugent Gets More Insane About Guns
109 posted on
04/19/2005 12:12:01 PM PDT by
PsyOp
(The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
To: All
"Talking to the two on the front porch of Rick's Gun Shop and Mount Hunger Archery in Mount Hunger, a gun and archery shop founded by Gorham in 1992, it's apparent they have a core belief in their constitutional rights as Americans to own firearms and to own private property. Both men believe constant vigilance is required to safeguard those freedoms."
The Right To Bear Arms Is As Old As Vermont
111 posted on
09/15/2005 2:10:27 PM PDT by
PsyOp
(After things go from bad to worse, the cycle will repeat.)
To: PsyOp
Your best defense is a hangun, say four local officers
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1522660/posts
"Now for what the officers had to say. Perhaps most important is that slogans such as "Protect and Serve" are just that slogans. Meaningless slogans. Be real. There is no way police can protect everybody from harm. They just cannot be at all places at all times."
"The men also addressed the myth that rank-and-file officers oppose gun rights and the National Rifle Association. Coercing officers into photo-ops, politicians such as Bill Clinton and Mayor Richard Daley would have you believe that police reject the Second Amendment. But 80 percent of street-level cops will tell you that if you want to protect yourself, get a gun."
"Police gun supporters used to number 95 percent to 98 percent, they said, but the figure is starting to erode because police departments in big liberal cities are looking for recruits with the view of Big Brother."
112 posted on
11/15/2005 1:51:14 PM PST by
PsyOp
(Men easily believe what they want to. – Caesar, De Bello Gallico, III, 18.)
To: All
Issues involving guns have taken center stage in the cultural divide that separates Red and Blue America. Gun-control advocates point to the militia clause of the Second Amendment, arguing that it warrants a collective, rather than an individual, right to keep and bear arms. However, history--buttressed by the Founders' clear understanding--dictates that the amendment guarantees this right to individual Americans.The U.S. Supreme Court has not dealt directly with the Second Amendment since 1939. Then, United States v. Miller held that a sawed-off shotgun was subject to registration because there was no evidence before the court that it had a military use. This opinion suggests that any demonstrably military weapon should enjoy the protection of the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court has conjured rights from the Constitution that do not exist in the text--while disparaging those rights contained in the document itself--leaving both sides of the gun debate cause for concern in any future rulings.
Amendment II: Right to bear arms
114 posted on
12/06/2005 3:28:30 PM PST by
PsyOp
(The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
To: PsyOp
I felt bad when the original 2nd Amendment Law Library shut down. However, I found a site that put up a lot of the legal scholarship found in the old library:
2nd Amendment Law Library
Too valuable a reference to have disappear.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson