Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN
BTW, my understanding of the "rhythm" method of contraception is that it's intended to maximize the likelihood that in the event that an ovum gets fertilized it will not manage to implant successfully. Doesn't that mean people practicing the rhythm method are actively trying to kill any embryos they might conceive?
94 posted on 11/06/2003 10:35:51 PM PST by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
BTW, my understanding of the "rhythm" method of contraception is that it's intended to maximize the likelihood that in the event that an ovum gets fertilized it will not manage to implant successfully. Doesn't that mean people practicing the rhythm method are actively trying to kill any embryos they might conceive?

No, this isn't the case. Generally speaking, ovulation occurs primarily at a point in the cycle that is quite favorable to implantation---when the uterine wall is well-prepared. So the primary effect of the rhythm method is to prevent conception, not implantation.

I do believe that it is possible for a woman to ovulate outside of that time frame on occasion. I've heard it can be in response to some stimulus (like sex) or spontaneous. I guess in that case there is a lower chance of implanation. But someone practicing the rhythm method isn't necessarily encouraging this phenomenon any more than someone who is not.

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

101 posted on 11/06/2003 11:05:46 PM PST by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson