To: pgyanke
In this instance, I consider "playing God" as determining what is alive and what isn't. I know what you mean. My high school biology teacher tried to tell me that bacteria were alive and rocks were not. He was playing God. People shouldn't be so judgemental. You're right, animists do have a point.
48 posted on
11/06/2003 7:05:37 PM PST by
beavus
To: beavus
You're right, animists do have a point. Idiots rarely do.
Shalom.
137 posted on
11/07/2003 9:30:40 AM PST by
ArGee
(Hey, how did I get in this handcart? And why is it so hot?)
To: beavus
You're being deliberately obtuse. You have a separate life when it is viable without further volitional human intervention.
As I said earlier, there comes a point where we can either observe the development of life or arrest it. When we can add nothing to it, it is unique. Just as in the case of Terri Schiavo, it is not mercy or any other euphamism to withhold that which all of us needs for sustenance... it is murder. The applicability to the womb is that this life would develop into a baby/child/adult (regardless whether it's one nanosecond after conception or 14 days) unless we take volitional action to ends its life.
Egg and sperm are cells. Left to their own and barring fertilization, they will remain and die as cells. Fertilization is the last volitional act required of man before the development of a new human being.
159 posted on
11/07/2003 1:57:13 PM PST by
pgyanke
("The Son of God became a man to enable men to become sons of God" - C.S. Lewis)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson