Quite a tirade there! How can you accuse me or anyone else defending the zygote as an individual human being of anthropomorphism regarding the zygote if you haven't been given the knowledge to know when it is that God brings the spirit to the body? To the contrary, it appears you've assigned humanity rather arbitrarily.
An accusation that you're anthropomorphising the zygote would be unfounded, yes.
That was the point. Read the post again; I did not categorically make such an accusation. I said that
I would not be guilty of dehumanization
if there is nothing to dehumanize; and that neither
you nor
I know when God considers that human life begins.
So I am accusing you only of acting out of certainty in something that you cannot be certain of.
You say I assign humanity arbitrarily, but I have not attempted to do so. By saying human life begins at conception, you have. To use purely naturalistic means to assign humanity, despite our shared belief that we are far more than the natural, is suspect. We see through the glass darkly.