Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
You seem to think MS is best in all cases, forgetting that for many applications it is grossly expensive, unstable, unsecure and high-maintenance.

Upon reading this, my first thought was, "I can't believe I debated this guy up to post 209 on this thread. What a waste of my time and jimrob's bandwidth."

If I tried my best, I couldn't come up with a stupider comment.

Good night, troll...

210 posted on 11/20/2003 7:18:40 PM PST by TheEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]


To: TheEngineer
If I tried my best, I couldn't come up with a stupider comment.

You have a problem with plain facts, don't you? My claims of expensive, unstable, unsecure and high-maintenance can be backed up by anyone who has had to admin MS systems. Unstable? Look at the low uptimes from Netcraft and the constant crashes admins have to deal with. Unsecure? A while ago, even Gartner suggested not buying MS because of the security issues. Personally, I'd only use IIS on an intranet site locked behind a firewall. I'd never expose myself to the internet with such an exploitable system.

211 posted on 11/21/2003 8:39:15 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson