To: Judith Anne
I agree. And imagine Sean agrees,too, but he took the more diplomatic approach. Sean isn't going to let this one slide, IMO.
138 posted on
11/06/2003 7:12:24 PM PST by
RGVTx
("France seems to us an aging whore desperate to attract even the most diseased customers.")
To: RGVTx; All
If we don't let Sean know that WE care about this, he's not going to have much faith in our ability to hold Rockefeller's feet to the fire.
If we're going to just be done being mad, and if we plan to let go and let it slide, then we're no better than the RINOs we criticize.
This involves the safety of our troops and the security of our nation in a time of war. Rockefeller plans to use his position on the Intel Committee to embarrass the commander in chief during an election year, no matter the cost to our troops or our nation's security. And he's not apologetic about it--in fact, he's being accusatory, the frikken bleep!
If that isn't treason, and if it isn't worth fighting for, and emailing about, NOTHING is. We either do it, or we don't.
139 posted on
11/06/2003 7:26:34 PM PST by
Judith Anne
(Send a message to the Democrat traitors--ROCKEFELLER MUST RESIGN!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson