Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheOtherOne
Businesses should be able to get Smoking Licenses, just like the can apply for and get liquor licenses. That way, the default for businesses will be non-smoking, but any that choses can become a smoking establishment.
Why license it? At best all that does is provide money and jobs to bureaucrats. At worst it lets them limit and control it above and beyond what the owners would do.

Simply requiring a "smoking permitted in this establishment" sign at each entrance accomplishes the same thing without governmental interference.

-Eric

219 posted on 11/07/2003 5:06:11 AM PST by E Rocc (Senator Robert Byrd voted against the Iraq package because he couldn't rename the country "Byrd".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: E Rocc
Simply requiring

Who's going to require it? What will you do if people don't?

Give me a break, that is regulation, just an ineffective one.

220 posted on 11/07/2003 5:24:07 AM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

To: E Rocc
Simply requiring a "smoking permitted in this establishment" sign at each entrance accomplishes the same thing without governmental interference.

Unfortunately the neeco-nasties don't see the logic in this.

246 posted on 11/07/2003 7:27:52 AM PST by Gabz (Smoke-gnatzies - small minds buzzing in your business - SWAT'EM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson