Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hotshot
I know we have agreed to disagree on this issue - but I do have to take issue with this particular coment of yours....

Second hand smoke causes asthma.

There is absolutely nothing to back up that statement in the way of scientific proof.

I will not deny that SHS may bring on an asthma attack - but it didn't cause the asthma to begin with.

Just the fact that there are more and more places where no one is going to be exposed to SHS and rates of asthma cases are nearly skyrocketing shows that statement to be false.

I was born in 1960, a time when smoking was much more prevalent than it is now. If exposure to smoking caused asthma, why was I nearly 30 before I ever met anyone who had asthma? Another question, why are so many children being diagnosed with it when the numbers of smoking parents (and particularly pregnant mothers) is on the decline?

203 posted on 11/06/2003 7:36:59 PM PST by Gabz (Smoke-gnatzies - small minds buzzing in your business - SWAT'EM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz
"Second hand smoke causes asthma."

There is absolutely nothing to back up that statement in the way of scientific proof.

Second-hand smoke has been linked to asthma People whose partners smoke are nearly five times more likely to develop asthma in adulthood than those who are not exposed to passive smoking, according to new research. And those who are exposed to second hand smoke at work are more than twice as likely to develop respiratory problems.

The risks of exposing children to passive smoking are already well-documented but until now, a direct link between passive smoking and asthma in adults has not been proven.

Now a team of scientists, led by Maritta Jaakkola, from the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health in Helsinki, has produced the first hard evidence to prove that passive smoking does play a role in the development of adult asthma.

Exposure

The scientists studied a total of 718 people, none of whom had ever smoked, from a region in southern Finland.

A total of 231 had been diagnosed with asthma in the previous two-and-a-half years - the remaining 487 represented the control group.

The team compared the amount of exposure the two groups had had to passive smoking over a 12-month period and found that the development of adult asthma was more prevalent in those who had had the most exposure.

Maritta Jaakkola, who presented her findings at the 11th European Congress on Lung Disease and Respiratory Medicine in Berlin this week, said: "Our results demonstrate conclusively that passive smoking plays a role in the development of adult asthma."

'Ground-breaking study'

Clive Bates, from anti-smoking group Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), believes the study will have enormous implications for employers who have not introduced anti-smoking regulations in the work-place.

He said: "This is a ground-breaking study which proves that passive smoking more than doubles the risk of developing asthma in adulthood.

"So, if employers have been negligent in reducing smoking in the work place, employees who develop asthma will have a fair chance of proving it was caused by passive smoking.

"And they will be able to claim thousands of pounds in compensation through the courts."

Mr Bates called on the government to introduce passive smoking legislation to reduce the risk of law suits to employers.

A German study, the results of which were also presented at the conference, linked passive smoking to lung cancer in women who had never smoked.

Meanwhile a study carried out in Italy reinforced the Finnish findings and also found that women were more likely to be exposed to passive smoking than men.

432 posted on 11/12/2003 7:02:47 AM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson