[91B]

If you can't see that 43% (43 out of a hundred) as compared to about 24% or 25% (24 or 25 out of a hundred) is substantially more in a compartative sense than 1 out of a hundred as compared to 2 out of a hundred then you are completely impervious to evidence and reason.

The fact that you would try to use this as an argument further demonstrates your mind-numbing irreason.

[#3Fan]

If you can't see that 43% (43 out of a hundred) as compared to about 24% or 25% (24 or 25 out of a hundred) is substantially more in a compartative sense than 1 out of a hundred as compared to 2 out of a hundred then you are completely impervious to evidence and reason.

It's more but still not that much more considering the exponentially added cost to recruitment due the the law of diminishing returns if there were no women in the military.