Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Well, they could have done the same to a male soldier. It was simply an act of violence.
31 posted on 11/05/2003 10:48:31 PM PST by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: billybudd
Point taken. But the prevailing social mores would lean much more in the other direction, IMO.

My point is mainly that, on the front lines, male soldiers should not have to face the additional psychological burden of feeling that they have to "care for" their female counterparts. This has been, and continues to be, the case ever since this idiotic experiment in PC political influence over the military began in the early 1990's.

Add: The Democrats have no concept of how to manage military operations, and so they have no business doing so -- and the conservaitives should stand up and tell them that this is the end of their inane experiments with our lives and fortunes.

48 posted on 11/05/2003 11:07:55 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("...the right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson