Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sweetliberty
Sounds like the judge told him what he needs to hear in order to dismiss the parents suits. He can't dismiss outright so he just gave the husband a roadmap.

1. Explain that you have provided medical care and 2. explain how the additional woman does not provide a conflict, probably with her testimony.

THEN I can dismiss their claims.
94 posted on 11/05/2003 7:09:01 PM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory
Oddly enough, it might meet the standard of suggesting predetermination which would suggest grounds for removal.

Upon filing the motion sworn to pay the party, the judge has to respond by stating that he is or is not biased in that respect. If a judge recuses himself it opens up all rulings which the judge made for review.

Remember in FL, the judical rules of conduct say that the appearance of impropriety my in and of itself be a violation.
98 posted on 11/05/2003 7:19:10 PM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

To: longtermmemmory
Sounds like the judge told him what he needs to hear in order to dismiss the parents suits. He can't dismiss outright so he just gave the husband a roadmap.

1. Explain that you have provided medical care and 2. explain how the additional woman does not provide a conflict, probably with her testimony.

If he denied Michael's Motion to Dismiss, then all of the points the Schindlers filed should be addressed.

After a hearing on Wednesday, Greer rejected a request from Schiavo for the Schindlers' latest petition to be dismissed. That decision means Schiavo's attorneys must respond in court to the charges in the suit, which include:

* Adultery in violation of Florida law;

* Misappropriation of funds awarded by a civil jury for Terri's rehabilitation;

* Conflict of interest. The Schindlers believe Schiavo may be trying to end Terri's life to avoid paying alimony that could be awarded if a new guardian successfully petitioned for a divorce on her behalf;

* Denial of health care in violation of Florida law;

* Failure to meet deadlines for completing guardianship plans as required by Florida law;

* Failure to complete annual guardian training as required by Florida law;

* Authorizing experimental medial procedures without court approval;

* Concealing information from the court; and

* Exceeding the specific guardianship authorities granted by the court, also allegedly in violation of Florida law.

Greer may have a problem with the misappropriation of funds, since he was the one that approved that.

142 posted on 11/05/2003 8:26:18 PM PST by Krodg (a proud member of the 'Godsquad')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson