Skip to comments.
Loving Monsters (Cougars are just big, lovable pussy cats, after all.)
Tech Central Station ^
| November 5, 2003
| Glenn Harlan Reynolds
Posted on 11/05/2003 11:50:47 AM PST by quidnunc
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Quote:
Nonetheless, the same strand of wishful thinking appears: perhaps this time, the cougars won't want to eat us. Some people, apparently, would rather be dinner than face up to the fact that nature is red in tooth and claw, and that in this fallen world, at least the lion lies down with the lamb only after the lamb's neck is broken. (Worse yet is the noxious strand of liberalism that suggests we somehow deserve to be dinner.)
The effort to remake the world so that it is safe for predators seems rather odd to me. What sort of person would rather be prey? The sort who lives in upscale neighborhoods, and campaigns against hunting, apparently. I suspect that over the long term this isn't a viable evolutionary strategy in a world where predators abound.
Only a few months ago a cougar-loving woman in Canada was killed and eaten while out jogging by a cougar.
1
posted on
11/05/2003 11:50:54 AM PST
by
quidnunc
To: quidnunc
Imagine that. The fruitcakes in the Boulder area are far more comfortable with a mountain lion killing a person than the other way around. Come to think of it, most liberals would rather see a person brutalized than shoot a two-legged predator also.
To: quidnunc; AAABEST; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ApesForEvolution; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
For real time political chat - Radio Free Republic chat room
3
posted on
11/05/2003 11:55:40 AM PST
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: quidnunc
4
posted on
11/05/2003 11:58:07 AM PST
by
martin_fierro
(_____oooo_(_°_¿_°_)_oooo_____)
To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!!
5
posted on
11/05/2003 12:03:54 PM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: Rocky Mountain High
The fruitcakes in the Boulder area are far more comfortable with a mountain lion killing a person than the other way around. Come to think of it, most liberals would rather see a person brutalized than shoot a two-legged predator also.Not a coincidence that the fruitcake left has applied this same philosophy to dealing with Islamic terrorists.
Which only goes to prove -- scratch a liberal, find a misanthrope.
6
posted on
11/05/2003 12:04:39 PM PST
by
Maceman
To: quidnunc
I got stalked by a mountain lion a couple of years ago while with a group on an "owling outing". She made her presence known, we stopped, and left her territory. The more reckless adults were all for continuing, but we had kids with us (trolling with lion bait) so we decided to go look for owls from the safety of the road.
Had we been attacked, after hearing her moving through the brush and hearing her warning growl, it would have been nobody's fault but ours. She would have been simply doing what comes natural, probably protecting a cub or two.
7
posted on
11/05/2003 12:08:26 PM PST
by
Not A Snowbird
(One of Those Dreaded Federal Employees)
To: quidnunc
I had a friend who raised cougars. I was horrified when my kids came home saying "he's so cute, he loves to fall asleep sucking on your fingers" (the cat already outweighed the kids). The cat was raised from a kitten, and even slept in their bed for a long time.
Several years later the cougar was dead. He had attacked the owner when he fell to his knees in the cage, and the owner shot him.
8
posted on
11/05/2003 12:08:56 PM PST
by
Grammy
To: SandyInSeattle
Had you been attacked, you would never have heard her.
9
posted on
11/05/2003 12:12:39 PM PST
by
Dead Dog
To: quidnunc
The latest cougar sighting in this neck of the woods occured three days ago when a UPS driver on his way to Colebrook, CT saw one near Danbury Quarters Road, only a couple miles from where another local named Pete had struck one with his vehicle over a month ago.
Fortunately, the DEP says that they do not exist, so there is no danger. So if you are being eaten, at least you can be comforted by the knowledge that you are being chewed to death by an imaginary beast.
10
posted on
11/05/2003 12:13:00 PM PST
by
Jim Cane
("I've always lived twice." ~ Dr. Sarcophagus.)
To: All
It is characteristic of liberals to see danger where none exists and to not see danger where it does. Personally, I am in favor of liberals being eaten by wildlife.
11
posted on
11/05/2003 12:20:48 PM PST
by
BadAndy
To: quidnunc
Now that New Jersey is completely in the hands of the Dems, it won't be long before the state is a risk free smorgasboard for the bears, coyotes, and cougars moving into the state. Of course maybe they'll just eat the geese. That could be a good thing.
To: BadAndy
The problem is, they make these environmental laws while sitting in their urban ivory towers. The children of suburban and rural conservatives are far more likely to be eaten.
Buy yes, I'm all for liberals being eatin'. I'd by the video.
13
posted on
11/05/2003 12:31:07 PM PST
by
Dead Dog
To: quidnunc
Get an Anatolian Shepherd, not only are the fabulous dogs to have in the family, you won't see cougars or other predators hanging around your place. We've had ours for four years and while the neighbors - 20 acres apart - are bothered by bears, cougar, even wolves now, they don't mess with our place. Just the presence of an Anatolian is usually enough to make predators avoid your area.
14
posted on
11/05/2003 12:38:09 PM PST
by
Maigret
To: Maigret
I prefer a large caliber firearm. Don't have to feed it the don't crap all over the place ect.
To: Dead Dog
Had you been attacked, you would never have heard her. Exactly! She was giving us fair warning to leave her alone.
16
posted on
11/05/2003 4:02:40 PM PST
by
Not A Snowbird
(One of Those Dreaded Federal Employees)
To: martin_fierro
Is that the guy that was turned into bear food?
17
posted on
11/05/2003 4:06:25 PM PST
by
Brett66
To: riverrunner
Yes, but your firearm doesn't adore you :)
18
posted on
11/05/2003 4:07:42 PM PST
by
Maigret
To: Brett66
Yup: The former S. Cal. druggie guy who thought grizzlys could be tamed by singing to them.
He and his girlfriend were proven wrong in spectacular fashion, caught on videotape.
19
posted on
11/05/2003 4:10:48 PM PST
by
martin_fierro
(_____oooo_(_°_¿_°_)_oooo_____)
To: quidnunc
To anybody who chooses to think about it, this makes sense. An unarmed human is a perfect prey for a cougar -- slow, hornless, clawless, no sharp senses, and lots of meat.
It was only by millenia of evolutionary teaching that coming close to a (habitually-armed) human meant death, that cougars avoided humans. It only took a few cougar generations to reverse that
20
posted on
11/05/2003 4:20:33 PM PST
by
SauronOfMordor
(Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer === (Finally employed again! Whoopie))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson