To: JohnHuang2
A lot of excitement about very little.
1. We don't know the source of even if it's authentic,
2. The Dems can easily turn it around and claim it's probably part of a WH dirty tricks op to help in their stonewalling effort on intel investigation.
3. People don't understand it --hedci, I don't undertans it.
4, There is no evidence of any intel being compromised.
I don't think this will fly.
To: cookcounty
Reread today's news - Rockefeller admitted it was his.
To: cookcounty
Reread today's news - Rockefeller admitted it was from his office, and admitted it was a draft.
To: cookcounty
Reread today's news - Rockefeller admitted it was from his office, and admitted it was a draft.
He also quoted extensively from it - seems he didn't know Fox News already read it before he started repeating it - verbatim.
To: cookcounty
1. We don't know the source of even if it's authentic,We know it was from Rockefeller's office - he had not denied that.
2. The Dems can easily turn it around and claim it's probably part of a WH dirty tricks op to help in their stonewalling effort on intel investigation.
We know it was from Rockefeller's office - he had not denied that.
nuff said
56 posted on
11/05/2003 7:53:04 AM PST by
mathluv
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson