[Robert A Cook PE]

Nope.

The question here is:

Shall an innocent woman be starved to death for a week to ten days, dying ignobly in her own waste without companionship or aid based solely on the unsubstantiated word of a man who wants her dead - All based solely on a supposed "memory" of a "remark" brought up 8 years later, just as that guardian finds he can make hundreds of thousands of dollars from an insurance deal and go live with his lover?

---...

Not a court in the country would sentence a convicted murderer to die bvased solely on third hand testimony - all the while denying that murderer any appeal, any review, nor any medical care.

[Deep_6]

Re:
"Not a court in the country would sentence a convicted murderer to
die bvased solely on third hand testimony"

I have trouble understanding how a well educated person as you
appear to be, misses important testimony previously given and
decides to listen only to those that support a cause based on their
heart alone.

It's your absolute right, of course. And there is no right or wrong
on either side of the fence.

The URLs and text I posted on this thread should be noted and
considered, however. I had been quite surprised to find the
Catholic Church does not oppose the removal of life support
systems.

Thanks.