Posted on 11/04/2003 10:21:42 AM PST by Jacob Kell
WASHINGTON -- A mystery munition knocked a U.S. Army M1A1 Abrams tank out of commission in Iraq, leading the Pentagon to question whether the terrorists have a secret weapon in their arsenal.
An unclassified Army report says a projectile punched through the vehicle and drilled a pencil-sized hole through the hull. The hole was so small that, according to the author's report, "my little finger will not go into it."
The Abrams tank is nearly invulnerable to attack. Only two have been disabled by enemy fire during the entire Iraq campaign, according to the Army Times. The other one was felled by a rocket-propelled grenade, or RPG-7. In the tank's 20-year career, only rarely have any others been disabled by enemy fire.
U.S. Army M1A1 Abrams tank
Yet, shortly before dawn Aug. 28, this 69-ton tank, on routine patrol in Baghdad "was hit by something," according to the report.
The small breach of the hull continued into the crew compartment, where it passed through the gunners seatback, grazed the kidney area of the gunners flak jacket and finally came to rest after boring a hole 1-½ to 2 inches deep in the hull on the far side of the tank.
Experts analyzing the strange attack are almost certain it was not the result of an RPG-7 attack. They suspect the damage was the result of something new, which is causing grave concern among tank drivers in Iraq and in the Pentagon.
"The unit is very anxious to have this 'SOMETHING' identified," wrote Terry Hughes, a technical representative from Rock Island Arsenal in Illinois, who wrote the report. "It seems clear that a penetrator of a yellow molten metal is what caused the damage, but what weapon fires such a round and precisely what sort of round is it? The bad guys are using something unknown and the guys facing it want very much to know what it is and how they can defend themselves."
The four-man crew suffered only minor injuries in the attack. The tank commander received "minor shrapnel wounds to the legs and arms and the gunner got some in his arm" as a result of the attack, according to the report.
But whatever penetrated the tank created enough heat inside the hull to activate the vehicle's Halon firefighting gear.
"Can someone tell us?" Hughes wrote. "If not, can we get an expert on foreign munitions over here to examine this vehicle before repairs are begun? Please respond quickly."
So far, no one has been able to answer Hughes' question.
One theory is an updated version of the RPG perhaps of more sophisticated Russian origin.
An even more bizarre theory, given the extremely small size of the breach, is some kind of experimental, previously unknown particle-beam weapon.
Besides the liberal media?
They are.
Just heard this on AM radio news, saying that the thinking IS that it was a "Particle Beam Weapon" of unknown origin.
Wrong, it was hit by a Kornet ATGM, not an RPG. About the most an RPG-7 can do to an Abrams is knock a tread off.
Gimme a break.
An RPG, esp. the newer models, CAN penetrate an Abrams if they hit it just right, as can other missles like the Kornet.
From the article: [The RPG] hollow-charge warhead easily could punch through an M1s skirt and the relatively thin armor of its armpit joint, the area above the tracks and beneath the deck on which the turret sits, just where the mystery round hit the tank
the tank may have been hit by an updated RPG. About 15 years ago, Russian scientists created tandem-warhead anti-tank grenades designed to defeat reactive armor. The new round, a PG-7VR, can be fired from an RPG-7V launcher and might have left the unusual signature on the tank . . .t appears most likely that an RPG-22 or some other improved variant of the Russian-designed weapon damaged the M1 tank, sources concluded. The damage certainly was caused by some sort of shaped-charge or hollow-charge warhead, and the cohesive nature of the destructive jet suggests a more effective weapon than a fragmented-jet RPG-7.
Like the man said in Casablanca: Round up the usual suspects.
Hetmani, huh? I'd think the old Rotmistr of post-Peter the Great cavalry detatchments would be more fitting for a treadhead, armored cavalryman or tank destroyer panzerjaeger....but whatever you think best, Vashe vysokoblagorodie Podpolkovnik!
You know anything about what the 509th parachute infantry have been up to lately?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.