Posted on 11/04/2003 8:28:03 AM PST by LittleRedRooster
Homeless in ... Las Vegas
Where a solution remains elusive
12:05 AM CST on Tuesday, November 4, 2003
Las Vegas may be a boomtown. But when it comes to addressing its homeless problem, the Nevada city has been something of a bust. Still, there's value in this story, because Dallas can learn from Las Vegas' mistakes.
While Southern Nevada's homeless population has grown in recent years, the commitment from local government and charities and the general public to meet the challenge has waned.
Who's not served?
Southern Nevada has about 10,000 homeless people about twice the number in the city of Dallas. Local government annually spends about $3 million, and local charities another $8 million, to serve that population. But those dollars are dwindling at a time when the needs are growing.
The metropolitan area of 1.6 million, in fact, has gotten a black eye. The National Coalition for the Homeless recently named Las Vegas the "meanest city" in America because of the city's harassment of the homeless, its frequent sweeps of homeless encampments and its overall hostile attitude toward the homeless. Ouch!
How did Las Vegas sink to the bottom?
What's not working?
A decade ago, then-Mayor Jan Jones, working arm in arm with charitable institutions, moved a number of social service agencies along the Las Vegas-North Las Vegas border to what became known as the "homeless corridor."
For a while, the concept seemed to work. Clustered together were a 200-bed emergency shelter, a women's shelter, a crisis intervention center and a transitional housing facility.
But the corridor eventually fell apart. Some agencies became caught in a vise of dwindling support from local government and private charities and had to close. And agency infighting only exacerbated matters.
Southern Nevada leaders then responded by organizing the Homelessness Task Force, under the umbrella of a regional planning agency, to come up with a more coordinated approach. The key plank to emerge: Ask the voters to tax themselves to raise $4 million a year from property taxes.
But that effort fell apart, too, when Clark County voters responded by saying "no" by nearly a 2-1 ratio. Homeless advocates were crushed.
Today, Clark County is trying to regroup by hiring a "homeless coordinator" to work with the six local governments in Southern Nevada. Clark County Manager Thom Riley has made fighting homelessness a higher priority; a comprehensive "needs assessment" of the problem will be completed by next year and serve as a focus for regional action.
Las Vegas hopes to succeed where it has failed before.
Lessons for Dallas
Until then, what can Dallas learn from the Nevada town's mistakes? After all, Las Vegas seemed to follow some of the same approaches as successful cities like clustering social service agencies and dealing with homelessness on a regional basis. Why did those other communities progress and Las Vegas falter?
Regional efforts are noteworthy, but a coordinated approach won't be productive unless there are dollars to back it up. The voters' refusal to tax themselves doomed any substantive solution.
It's no wonder the public didn't feel invested in a solution. Their political leaders' rhetoric was nothing less than irresponsible at times. During a state of the city speech, Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman said of the homeless: "They're raping people, they're robbing people, and they're killing their own."
Instead of inflammatory cheap shots, the electorate needs to hear what homeless programs work and why they deserve support.
An unscientific poll by the Las Vegas Review-Journal asked this question: "How should the city handle the homeless problem?" The most popular answer: "Give them bus tickets out of town." A Las Vegas businessman actually launched such an effort this summer.
How sad. Dallas can do better.
As Horace Greely said "go west young man" and San Fran would love to have you.
Oh, if it were only so. Cut local support for the homeless to zero and soon you will have zero homeless. You may still have to listen to the activists but ignoring them becomes easier.
I couldn't agree more thay have opted out of having day to day responsibilty in their lives which is fine by me just don't ask me to tax myself to pay for that lifestyle.
I just have a problem with people voting 2-1 against something and then having the author say the voters are mean and wrong.
I'll bet. They had to get real jobs, instead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.