Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shell implants 'burn out' cancer cells
Guardian ^ | November 4, 2003 | Tim Radford, science editor

Posted on 11/04/2003 8:18:51 AM PST by demlosers

American scientists have found a new way to "burn" cancer tumours but leave healthy tissue unhurt. The technique harnesses nanotechnology - science at the scale of a millionth of a millimetre - to reach cancers beyond the surgeon's knife.

So far, the technique has been tested only on laboratory mice. Jennifer West and colleagues at Rice University in Houston report today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that they started with nanoshells, tiny molecules of silica coated with gold, that could absorb infrared light.

The nanoshells were so small that they could be incorporated into human breast cancer cells cultured in the laboratory and then irradiated with near infrared light.

This is too cool to hurt healthy tissue, but quite enough to bring the tiny metal coated shells to a high temperature.

Then they checked the results. The tumour cells showed signs of irreversible heat damage and cell death, while the control cells were unharmed.

So the team then injected their invisible gold bullets into tumours growing on mice, and then bathed the mice in doses of near infrared light.

Within four to six minutes, the shells inside the tumours reached temperatures high enough to kill, and again, the surrounding tissue remained unharmed.

It could be years before the technique becomes part of the surgeon's arsenal, but it offers a new way to get at tumours that are small, difficult to reach or deep in vital tissue.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS:
Gold "nano-bullets" shoot down tumours

13:02 04 November 03

NewScientist.com news service

Gold "nano-bullets" could seek and destroy inoperable human cancers, suggest new studies by US scientists.

The tiny silica particles are plated with gold and heat up when near infrared light (NIR) is shone on them. This kills the cancer cells. Tests on human breast cancers, both in the test tube and in tumours in mice, were highly successful, the researchers report in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"The nanoshells are designed to absorb near infrared light and convert that light to heat," explains Jennifer West, who led the study at Rice University, Houston, Texas. This is possible because the body's normal tissues are "essentially transparent" to NIR.

West says the potential benefits of the treatment should be that, unlike other cancer treatments such as surgery, it would be non-invasive. Both NIR and the nanoshells are completely harmless by themselves, she says.

"We believe that we should also be able to treat very small metastases, not detected yet," West told New Scientist. More recent, unpublished work by the group, has shown that the gold bullets can be injected into the blood stream and find their way to cancer cells in mice.

"These results are promising, particularly for tumours that cannot be treated by surgery," says Emma Knight, at Cancer Research UK. "However, the studies are at a very early stage."

On/off switch

The Rice University team created nanoparticles from a non-conducting core of silica with a diameter of 110 nanometres and a 10 nm thick metal shell. Gold was used because it is biologically inert.

When the nanoshells were added to human breast cancer cells in the test tube, and then exposed to both NIR, 100 per cent were killed, says West. "And we saw no changes in cell viability with just nanoshells or just the laser - it's a true on/off situation."

The team also injected the nanoshells directly into the tumours of living mice and applied NIR. The tumours were destroyed within days.

Warming the tumour cells to only about 55°C is enough to kill them, because it changes the permeability of the cell membrane. "Leakiness is what causes the cell to die," West explains. "Cells normally have to have a very tightly controlled barrier between the inside of the cells and the fluid surrounding them. If you disrupt that, you create huge pores which lets everything across, significantly changing the composition of the fluid inside - it ends up very toxic."

Right on target

The team has now engineered the nanoshells to specifically target tumour cells. In a recent study, submitted to Cancer Letters, they injected mice with nanoshells attached to an antibody that only binds to cancer cells. She says the tumours were "completely destroyed" and 150 days later the mice were alive and well with no tumour growth.

This unpublished study was done in collaboration with Nanospectra Biosciences in Houston, which is now in talks with the US Food and Drugs Administration about moving to human clinical trials within the next 12 to 18 months. These trials are planned in patients with a severe, highly lethal form of lung cancer called mesothilioma.

West says that in the longer term, they hope the nanoshells could even be used as a precautionary measure, killing cancers while they are too small to be detected. "For example, if you had genes predisposing you to breast cancer, you could have this done on a periodic basis," she says.

Nanoshells have not been used to treat cancer before, but the concept of targeting tumour cells and then delivering a killer blow not unique. For example, a team at Nottingham University in the UK is developing a way of delivering a "prodrug" using tumour-loving bacteria. When the drug is activated by an injected molecule, only the tumour cells are killed.

1 posted on 11/04/2003 8:18:51 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: demlosers
All I can say is "Holy Sh!t!"...

Astounding.
2 posted on 11/04/2003 8:22:53 AM PST by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Incredible. I sent this on to my family. Really incredible. I suppose we'd get this sort of breakthrough if we all want back to the bark eating, filth embracing lifestyle promoted by PETA freaks and eco-losers.
3 posted on 11/04/2003 8:29:25 AM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
I suppose we'd get this sort of breakthrough if we all want back to the bark eating, filth embracing lifestyle promoted by PETA freaks and eco-losers.

You wouldn't, but (they would add) a healthy lifestyle would mean a lower probability of cancer.

4 posted on 11/04/2003 9:34:55 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
A shorter lifespan=lower probability of cancer, too. Bark eating scavenger people don't live long.
5 posted on 11/04/2003 9:37:29 AM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Huck
"Bark eating scavenger people don't live long"

When lifespan was short, not that long ago, anything you died of other than a bullet was called consumption, including cancer!
6 posted on 11/04/2003 9:51:04 AM PST by dalereed (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson