Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: runningbear
That argument is a long shot, analysts say, because mitochondrial DNA evidence is now typically one of many pieces of evidence used to build cases and most states have allowed it as courtroom evidence.

Thanks for ping...

Haven't followed the trial as of yet, how's it looking for Peterson and the defense? I'd say attacking the DNA is a long shot, if that's all they have. Too many people have been freed based on its conclusions. They can't have it both ways.

10 posted on 11/04/2003 6:24:10 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reaganwuzthebest
It's mitochondrial DNA..Not the overwhelming percentage like nuclear..more like a a 1 in 176 chance than a 1 in a trillion chance of it coming from someone else.It has been accepted in other states,27,I believe.
11 posted on 11/04/2003 6:28:45 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson