ThinkPlease: "If that were the case, do you think any ID paper would have been published.(?) Methinks you are overstating just a tad."
The overwhelmingly majority view remains that no peer-reviewd ID paper has been published. Just ask around. It's pretty much ex cathedra.
That's because no one wants to touch the question of who's the designer. If it's God, this is just Creationism. If it's not God, then who?
If ID is going to go anywhere as a serious body of knowledge, it has to get past this hurdle. Then it has to define "complexity" as something more than "I know it when I see it". And it needs to provide more evidence than "biologists don't know something".